A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

Reportedly, Microsoft has been banning and wiping the accounts of users who have leveraged Skype to contact relatives in Gaza. In some cases, email accounts over a decade old have been locked, destroying access to banking accounts, OneDrive storage, and beyond.

United States resident Salah Elsadi lost his account of over 15 years in the dragnet. “I’ve had this Hotmail for 15 years. They banned me for no reason, saying I have violated their terms — what terms? Tell me. I’ve filled out about 50 forms and called them many many times.” Eiad Hametto from Saudi Arabia echoed the report, “We are civilians with no political background who just wanted to check on our families. They’ve suspended my email account that I’ve had for nearly 20 years. It was connected to all my work. They killed my life online.”

Many of the users affected by the bans expressed that Microsoft may be falsely labelling them as Hamas

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t understand why it’s so mainstream to equate Palestine with Hamas. It’s as if there is an actual conspiracy going on to to support this genocide. Is it because it’s so easy to say you’re antiemetic if you oppose “the Jews”?

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s completely normalized racism. America has been institutionalizing Islamophobia for years to justify their invasions of the Middle East where we kill millions of innocent civilians “terorrists”

      Before the 2000’s a lot of that manufactured hate was directed towards Asians because we needed to justify war crimes in Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Laos etc.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2007/07/gary-hart-lynne-cheney-and-war-with-china/7644/

        Early in 2001, the commission presented a report to the incoming G.W. Bush administration warning that terrorism would be the nation’s greatest national security problem, and saying that unless the United States took proper protective measures a terrorist attack was likely within its borders. Neither the president nor the vice president nor any other senior official from the new administration took time to meet with the commission members or hear about their findings.

        The commission had 14 members, split 7-7, Republican and Democrat, as is de rigeur for bodies of this type. Today Hart told me that in the first few meetings, commission members would go around the room and volunteer their ideas about the nation’s greatest vulnerabilities, most urgent needs, and so on.

        At the first meeting, one Republican woman on the commission said that the overwhelming threat was from China. Sooner or later the U.S. would end up in a military showdown with the Chinese Communists. There was no avoiding it, and we would only make ourselves weaker by waiting. No one else spoke up in support.

        The same thing happened at the second meeting – discussion from other commissioners about terrorism, nuclear proliferation, anarchy of failed states, etc, and then this one woman warning about the looming Chinese menace. And the third meeting too. Perhaps more.

        Finally, in frustration, this woman left the commission.

        “Her name was Lynne Cheney,” Hart said. “I am convinced that if it had not been for 9/11, we would be in a military showdown with China today.” Not because of what China was doing, threatening, or intending, he made clear, but because of the assumptions the Administration brought with it when taking office. (My impression is that Chinese leaders know this too, which is why there are relatively few complaints from China about the Iraq war. They know that it got the U.S. off China’s back!)

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Plenty of folks on here have bought into the China Boogeyman narrative. Her family’s propaganda has been devastatingly effective. We likely will be at war with China in another generation, given our current trajectory.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              China isn’t blameless. Factory and camp narratives aside, their naval actions are bellicose.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                their naval actions are bellicose

                The atrocities that western nations have had to commit to keep a foothold in places like Osaka, the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, and India really disqualify any of these folks from claiming another country is “bellicose”. We’re still out in Oceania committing genocides of native peoples, to this day.

                That’s before you get into some belly-aching about a Chinese warship sailing through the Straight of Taiwan, as though its not American property.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Hahaha. First of all this is old, there’s not any bases in Afghanistan anymore. Second, this is the same propaganda Russia runs with about NATO. They do belligerent stuff and then complain when their neighbors ask the country with a bigger stick for protection. Also, did someone include HK in this graphic? I know there’s lots of US bases in the Pacific, but I think someone is gilding the lily.

                  But also no, it’s not just about sailing a ship through Taiwanese waters. We do the same thing to China all the time, just to remind them that under international law that’s okay.

                  It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                  It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ, far larger than international law allows and completely disregarding any potential EEZ for other countries in the area.

                  It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                  It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                  The list goes on…

                  • pop@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Hahaha. First of all this is old

                    wow what an attitude. everything will get old, so you’re fine with your sides atrocities cuz they’re “old” but it’s just not acceptable with others. Hahaha, suddenly a saint of peace, eh?

                    It more seems like you’ll be fine by no matter what your side does, and will have deflections lined up with propaganda but are gonna have a meltdown when it’s the other side doing what you fuckers do without consequences.

                    Attitude like yours is why there’ll never be peace.

                  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                    This is not a one sided provocation. We do war games with South Korea and Japan every year where we pretend to invade China and North Korea.

                    It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ, far larger than international law allows and completely disregarding any potential EEZ for other countries in the area.

                    The waters that China (both the PRC and ROC btw) claims were promised to them under an international treaty that predates the League of Nations China never agreed to cede those waters, other countries started sailing in them during the Chinese Civil War when neither side could enforce their claim, and the modern UN’s position is that China lost their claim through lack of enforcement.

                    It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                    You mean the one fishing vessel that sank in an accident? The Chinese crew was grossly negligent, sure, but you make it sound the PLAN is sailing around shooting at fisherman.

                    It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                    We all do that. I agree it’s bad but there would need to be a mutual stand down agreement.

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    there’s not any bases in Afghanistan anymore

                    There actually are several NATO installations still in and around Kabul to secure the international airport and the US Embassy.

                    It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                    The US also conducts war games across the South China Sea, including between China and Japan and through the Chinese territorial waters in and around the Korean peninsula. These have become tit-for-tat exercises, and would stop if the US was no longer in the region.

                    It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ

                    Glances at the US base map Yes. Ridiculous.

                    It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                    Show your work. When did China conduct a military operation to sink a fishing vessel?

                    It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                    I’m sure they’ll quit right after the NSA does.

              • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Why would China engage in military conflict with the USA when they can just sit back and watch the USA collapse on its own?

      • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        4 months ago

        Without America the Palestine people would have starved to death years ago. Their own Arabian brothers won’t even help them. America doesn’t need to institionalize islamaphobia when they do it themselves. You can look into any Islam media and you would find they actively burn u.s. flags on state media and call for our destruction. Nothing was needed to justify your made up war crimes in any of those countries because they all started the wars. Japan bombed pearl harbor. North Korea invaded South Korea. Vietnam Gulf of tonkin. Etc etc.

        • BigLgame@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol fuck off with that hard angle, also the Gulf of Tonkin was a false flag.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The fun thing with Tonkin is it doesn’t even need to be a false flag, it can credibly be explained by a bad radar return. I don’t know which is is a worse basis to get 400,000 Americans Killed? (Including Agent Orange and Suicide numbers)

          • ashar@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Haha that was funny. Mentioning the Gulf of Tonkin incident as justification for war and really meaning it

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Without America, Palestine would be united and free by now. A single multicultural country from the river to the sea that can recognize and celebrate its diverse people and history. Instead though we have a genocidal European colony.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          LO-fuckin-L at using Gulf of Tonkin, a well known false flag operation meant solely to draw the US into a protracted conflict we had no business being in. 🤡

          • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean sure maybe the August 4th incident was overblown but the August 2nd 1964 incident did happen where our ship was attacked by Vietnam torpedo boats. Maybe you get attacked and don’t do shit at all about it who is the real clown there?

            • prole@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Ohhhh got it, only one false flag attack was committed by the US. That means the war in Vietnam was justified.

              To be clear regarding “false flag” operations for anyone unaware: this entails attacking our own military in order to provide spurious cassus belli to enter a conflict we had no valid reason to enter. In this case, a civil war on the other side of the planet, in a bay we should never have been in to begin with.

              How stupid does a person need to be to think that, not only was the war in Vietnam justified, but that the Gulf of Tonkin false flag incident is that justification?

              • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                4 months ago

                Vietnam torpedo boats attacked our ship on August 2 1964. Deny that fact as much as you want. Our ship was in international waters when attacked. There were multiple justifications to get in that war I don’t really care to get into them. Tldr: We help our allies and protect democracy in the region.

                • pop@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  We help our allies and protect democracy in the region.

                  LMAO. Your military protects interests of the billionaires and their economy. It has fuck all to do about democracy.

                  But keep guzzling whatever you already are, those braincells aren’t going to repeat propaganda by itself.

                  • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    South Vietnam allied. Democracy in the region couldn’t fall because it creates a domino effect where democracy looks week.

                    Wtf are you talking about billionaires. Our military protects the interests of all our allies especially European and Asian.

                  • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    You use re-vanced lmfao. Fuck outta here brokie. Just a sad propagandized loser who despises their own country.

                • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The 6 day Israel-Arab war. A casualty was encourred and Israel pleaded it was an accidental casualty of war. They made concessions.

                  The gulf of tonkin. Not a casualty but a calculated attack.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Yep complete accident. Have you read any of the reports? The ship was broadcasting it’s nationality in every way possible. The only way it was a mistake was if the Israelis turned off all of their communications and fired with their eyes closed.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Without America the Palestine people would have starved to death years ago. Their own Arabian brothers won’t even help them.

          Iran won’t help Palestine, but also Iran is the shadowy hand behind Hamas.

          Egypt won’t help Palestine, but the CIA/MI5 need to coup the elected government every decade or three when it gets to Muslim Brotherhood-y.

          Lebanon won’t help Palestine, but Israel says there are tunnels into Gaza from Lebanon so they need to start bombing again.

          Turkyie won’t help Palestine, but the IDF had to murder Turkish aid workers in 2010 to prevent their aid flotilla from reaching the shore.

          • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            So Palestinians are Hamas?
            Why is Iran not helping Fatah?
            Their support of Hamas is on ideological grounds. Israel is holy waqf land that belongs to Muslims and should be cleansed from Jews.

            Even when Egypt had sovereignty over Gaza they made sure to prevent Palestinians from going to Egypt.

            Tunnels from Lebanon… to Gaza…? Where’d you read that?
            Hezbollah begun bombing Israel in support of Hamas. They’re also funded by Iran (much more than Hamas though).
            Meanwhile Palestinians live in camps in Lebanon. Some of those walled and surrounded by watchtowers.
            They have less rights there than anyone else (including refugees and migrant workers), despite living there for 3 generations at this point.

            Turkey under Erdogan has been mostly hosting Hamas leaders while bombing Kurds in Syria.

            I don’t think much needs to be said about Assad.

            The only country in the area which actually helped Palestinians was Jordan. Although that also changed for a while after Black September.

            Most of UNRWA’s funding over the years has come from the EU and USA.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Israel is holy waqf land that belongs to Muslims and should be cleansed from Jews.

              That’s crazy because I’ve heard Israelis assert the exact opposite.

              Most of UNRWA’s funding over the years has come from the EU and USA.

              There’s a certain dramatic irony in funding UNRWA, paying Israel to bomb UNRWA, and then claiming you’re the only folks providing aid to Palestinians.

              • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s crazy because I’ve heard Israelis assert the exact opposite.

                Yes, religious extremists exist also in Israel.

                There’s a certain dramatic irony in funding UNRWA, paying Israel to bomb UNRWA, and then claiming you’re the only folks providing aid to Palestinians.

                I’m not the one who wrote USA is the only one providing aid.
                What you quoted is the reality. The bulk of the funding over the years has been from the USA and the EU.

          • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Iran won’t help Palestine, but also Iran is the shadowy hand behind Hamas.

            Your point being what? That they fund Hamas so they’re helping?

            Egypt won’t help Palestine, but the CIA/MI5 need to coup the elected government every decade or three when it gets to Muslim Brotherhood-y.

            Somehow Egypt helps them by having secret govt backed coups? Instead they could have just taken in refugees but why would they do that? They’ll just have a coup instead.

            Lebanon won’t help Palestine, but Israel says there are tunnels into Gaza from Lebanon so they need to start bombing again.

            So Lebanon helps the Palestine people by building tunnels where Hamas stored weapons and hostages?

            Turkyie

            I recall the Turkish police raiding those same charity offices accusing them of being linked to Islamic terrorists.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Your point being what? That they fund Hamas so they’re helping?

              Uh… Literally yes. Palestinian Islamist resistance is the only notable resistance movement in Palestine.

              Somehow Egypt helps them by having secret govt backed coups? Instead they could have just taken in refugees but why would they do that? They’ll just have a coup instead.

              My man the Egyptian government is an American puppet what are you talking about?

              So Lebanon helps the Palestine people by building tunnels where Hamas stored weapons and hostages?

              Literally yes. See above.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You can look into any Islam media and you would find they actively burn u.s. flags on state media and call for our destruction.

          Well yes. Do you have any idea how much US neo-colonialism has harmed the Middle East over the past 70 years? Your country supports ISIS for fuck’s sake go touch some grass.

          Also why do you think their Muslim brothers won’t help them? Surely not because most of the Arab world is run by American puppets.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand why it’s so mainstream to equate Palestine with Hamas

      Decades of Islamophobic propaganda combined with a strong American economic interest in Israel might have played a role.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Basically we spent 20 years fighting “terrorists”. So now it’s really easy to paint one side or the other as the “terrorists”. And thanks to Islamophobia pushed by mainstream TV shows and Movies, if you get painted as a “terrorist” then everyone in your country is also a “terrorist”.

      The word is in quotes because very few of the groups fought by regular forces (regular infantry as opposed to special operations) were actually international militant NGOs like Al Qaeda. Mostly they were local militias mad at the coalition forces for their own reasons, like “Why did you kill my kid in an airstrike!?!”, or “I like the Taliban because they pay me really good for the poppy you torched. Also, you torched my livelihood in a country that has no safeguards against starving to death.” And even the Taliban, ridiculously evil bastards that they are, were never an AQ like group. They were concerned solely with taking back Afghanistan.

      All of this nuance was lost on anyone who didn’t read the actual reports coming out of these countries though and many of those reports were classified. So all most people got was their favorite action and/or police drama shoveling the idea that all muslims are terrorists. With a side of Fox News villifying any brown people they could find.

      So now, Israel walks in, sees all this, screams “terrorist!” and shoots the nearest Gazan kid. Predictable results were predicted many times by academic scholars.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t understand why it’s so mainstream to equate Palestine with Hamas.

      Because the mainstream is unironically ignorant of the true political and social state of Palestinian society. They don’t realise that Hamas is an extremist Palestinian political party, while the actual moderate Palestinian faction worthy of support is the Palestinian Liberation Organisation. Show them this Wikipedia page of the ongoing civil war among Palestinians and you’d get cricket noises from the average perpetually online mainstream.

      Gaza is controlled by the Hamas, while the West Bank is controlled by PLO/Fatah. But no one in the mainstream in the Twiterrati, Facebook and other social media will know that, because they get junk food information from fake news and propaganda or their own bubble in those social platforms.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The PLO was voted out in Gaza because they were nothing but Israeli puppets. They actually lost the entire election, but Israel and the US blocked Hamas from taking control of the government in West Bank too. And now there’s this narrative that Hamas violently seized power without acknowledging that there was an election and the result was not honored without that seizure.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Many Palestinian protests have people cosplaying Hamas and waving Hamas flags.

      Hanging out with people that like to dress up as a member of a group that wants to kill Jews makes someone a little antisemitic I think.

      Denying that there’s an antisemitism problem in the Palestinian movement doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. In fact that’s the sort of attitude that allows it to persist.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Denying that there’s an antisemitism problem in the Palestinian movement doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

        Uh… Did you expect them to not be antisemitic? I mean it’s not a good thing but what other outcome did you expect from 75 years of Apartheid and genocide?

        That aside, Hamas is the only viable resistance group in Palestine, other than maybe PIJ (which is more extremist). What do you expect them to do?

        Edit: Oh I misread and thought they were talking about the resistance movement in Palestine. Nevermind this guy is just making shit up.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Please point to where the anti Israeli movement hates All Arab and Hebrew speakers?

          Jews are not the only semites and yes everything I’ve seen in the US is directed at the country, not the people.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Jews are not the only semites

            Okay this only really works as a gotcha. It doesn’t do anything to address the point being made. That aside,

            Please point to where the anti Israeli movement hates All Arab and Hebrew speakers?

            I misread their comment and thought they were talking about Palestinian resistance in Palestine, not the worldwide Anti-Zionist movement so nevermind anything I said up there.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              It is a gotcha, but it’s also important to understanding Israel’s victim propaganda. They’re not being truthful. They’re trying to paint any opposition as racist.

    • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      Do you ignore the majority of Palestinians support Hamas? It’s factual reality the majority of Palestinians democratically voted and elected Hamas which ran on a destroy Israel agenda. In reality they asked and started this war due to that election. It’s not because it’s so easy to say they are antisemitic it’s because it is factually correct to say it.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Every sentence in your comment is another israeli propaganda lie. None of them are factually correct. Congrats on a new Hasbara record.

      • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        So all Americans are dickheads because Trump won democratically in 2016?

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          What if you changed that statement to all conservatives instead of all Americans? Because not all conservatives support Trump or voted for him in 2016. But he is now representative of them.

          Like. Hamas wouldn’t exist without the actions of Israel. And that is exactly why so many Palestinians have thrown their support behind Hamas. But that doesn’t mean Palestinians, Hamas, or even conservative Americans are a monolith.

          The point is rather that the group is being labeled in such a way to discredit efforts to give Palestinians the human rights everyone should have. It’s the same thing that happened with the Black Community in the US and the black Panthers. This has been a thing for centuries with just about every grass roots or guerilla militia in existence. At some point if you buck the ruling classes power, you become a target and the propaganda follows.

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t know why you replied to me.

            I agree with you is impossible to say ALL people from a country is something based on who wins a election. Sometimes the winning candidate doesn’t have the majority if you count the opposition + people who do not vote.

            My original comment is sarcastic, it seems that I need to add /s to be clear.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you ignore the majority of Palestinians support Hamas?

        Imagine supporting the only viable resistance organization when you’re subjected to a slow-burn genocide. The humanity!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        They didn’t actually support Hamas in 2023, until Israel bombed them into the stone age and supported shifted. Which is the same phenomenon we’ve seen in every war with a massive bombing campaign since 1936. They did vote democratically, and that vote was blocked by Israel and the US. The platform though was a moderate one in which they drew a line between Israel and people. They very much want to destroy the country but they believe they can live with the people as long as there’s not an apartheid power structure. A line they still have in their doctrine today, a line people like you blithely ignore. Also that election was nearly 20 years ago. Are you admitting that Hamas and Israel were already at war? Usually the party line is there was peace and doves and olive trees until the barbarous Hamas blew it all up. And the people in Hamas are also semites. They are literally semites.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        This guy answered “what would you do?” with “enthusiastically support the Nazis”