A BBC investigation reveals that Microsoft is permanently banning Palestinians in the U.S. and other countries who use Skype to call relatives in Gaza.

Reportedly, Microsoft has been banning and wiping the accounts of users who have leveraged Skype to contact relatives in Gaza. In some cases, email accounts over a decade old have been locked, destroying access to banking accounts, OneDrive storage, and beyond.

United States resident Salah Elsadi lost his account of over 15 years in the dragnet. “I’ve had this Hotmail for 15 years. They banned me for no reason, saying I have violated their terms — what terms? Tell me. I’ve filled out about 50 forms and called them many many times.” Eiad Hametto from Saudi Arabia echoed the report, “We are civilians with no political background who just wanted to check on our families. They’ve suspended my email account that I’ve had for nearly 20 years. It was connected to all my work. They killed my life online.”

Many of the users affected by the bans expressed that Microsoft may be falsely labelling them as Hamas

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s completely normalized racism. America has been institutionalizing Islamophobia for years to justify their invasions of the Middle East where we kill millions of innocent civilians “terorrists”

    Before the 2000’s a lot of that manufactured hate was directed towards Asians because we needed to justify war crimes in Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Laos etc.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2007/07/gary-hart-lynne-cheney-and-war-with-china/7644/

      Early in 2001, the commission presented a report to the incoming G.W. Bush administration warning that terrorism would be the nation’s greatest national security problem, and saying that unless the United States took proper protective measures a terrorist attack was likely within its borders. Neither the president nor the vice president nor any other senior official from the new administration took time to meet with the commission members or hear about their findings.

      The commission had 14 members, split 7-7, Republican and Democrat, as is de rigeur for bodies of this type. Today Hart told me that in the first few meetings, commission members would go around the room and volunteer their ideas about the nation’s greatest vulnerabilities, most urgent needs, and so on.

      At the first meeting, one Republican woman on the commission said that the overwhelming threat was from China. Sooner or later the U.S. would end up in a military showdown with the Chinese Communists. There was no avoiding it, and we would only make ourselves weaker by waiting. No one else spoke up in support.

      The same thing happened at the second meeting – discussion from other commissioners about terrorism, nuclear proliferation, anarchy of failed states, etc, and then this one woman warning about the looming Chinese menace. And the third meeting too. Perhaps more.

      Finally, in frustration, this woman left the commission.

      “Her name was Lynne Cheney,” Hart said. “I am convinced that if it had not been for 9/11, we would be in a military showdown with China today.” Not because of what China was doing, threatening, or intending, he made clear, but because of the assumptions the Administration brought with it when taking office. (My impression is that Chinese leaders know this too, which is why there are relatively few complaints from China about the Iraq war. They know that it got the U.S. off China’s back!)

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Plenty of folks on here have bought into the China Boogeyman narrative. Her family’s propaganda has been devastatingly effective. We likely will be at war with China in another generation, given our current trajectory.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            China isn’t blameless. Factory and camp narratives aside, their naval actions are bellicose.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              their naval actions are bellicose

              The atrocities that western nations have had to commit to keep a foothold in places like Osaka, the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, and India really disqualify any of these folks from claiming another country is “bellicose”. We’re still out in Oceania committing genocides of native peoples, to this day.

              That’s before you get into some belly-aching about a Chinese warship sailing through the Straight of Taiwan, as though its not American property.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Hahaha. First of all this is old, there’s not any bases in Afghanistan anymore. Second, this is the same propaganda Russia runs with about NATO. They do belligerent stuff and then complain when their neighbors ask the country with a bigger stick for protection. Also, did someone include HK in this graphic? I know there’s lots of US bases in the Pacific, but I think someone is gilding the lily.

                But also no, it’s not just about sailing a ship through Taiwanese waters. We do the same thing to China all the time, just to remind them that under international law that’s okay.

                It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ, far larger than international law allows and completely disregarding any potential EEZ for other countries in the area.

                It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                The list goes on…

                • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                  This is not a one sided provocation. We do war games with South Korea and Japan every year where we pretend to invade China and North Korea.

                  It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ, far larger than international law allows and completely disregarding any potential EEZ for other countries in the area.

                  The waters that China (both the PRC and ROC btw) claims were promised to them under an international treaty that predates the League of Nations China never agreed to cede those waters, other countries started sailing in them during the Chinese Civil War when neither side could enforce their claim, and the modern UN’s position is that China lost their claim through lack of enforcement.

                  It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                  You mean the one fishing vessel that sank in an accident? The Chinese crew was grossly negligent, sure, but you make it sound the PLAN is sailing around shooting at fisherman.

                  It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                  We all do that. I agree it’s bad but there would need to be a mutual stand down agreement.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    We do not pretend to invade China. There is no plan to invade a country of a billion people with a Normandy style landing across the entire ocean. That’s a ridiculous claim. And as for planning to fight NK, you think maybe their constant nuclear threats against the US West Coast have anything to do with that?

                    South Korea has been an ally for 70 years, we aren’t just going to leave them. Trying to make defending allies and aggressively going after the vessels of other countries in an insane claim of an economic zone equivalent is just ridiculous.

                    According to China, the claims predate modern civilization entirely. That doesn’t make them true or consistent with international law.

                    It wouldn’t matter if it was just one vessel, but no it’s not. And the Chinese Coast Guard didn’t play it off as an accident. They said the Vietnamese fisherman had refused to leave the area China was claiming. For more fuckery let’s look at them stealing military supplies from the Philippine Navy.

                    Like I said above, the list goes on. And if all we ever do is conduct a war game to remind NK they aren’t shit we could never be as aggressive as China.

                • pop@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Hahaha. First of all this is old

                  wow what an attitude. everything will get old, so you’re fine with your sides atrocities cuz they’re “old” but it’s just not acceptable with others. Hahaha, suddenly a saint of peace, eh?

                  It more seems like you’ll be fine by no matter what your side does, and will have deflections lined up with propaganda but are gonna have a meltdown when it’s the other side doing what you fuckers do without consequences.

                  Attitude like yours is why there’ll never be peace.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    No it’s also wrong. The US has never had a base in Hong Kong. And most of the bases in the area pre-date China’s rise to being a regional power, much less their modern stance.

                    This is just straight up main character syndrome in national form.

                    Also we aren’t out there sinking or seizing Chinese vessels and threatening invasions. Our entire stance is, “leave our allies alone”.

                    But leave it to someone from .ml to ride in and try to twist the truth in China’s favor.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  there’s not any bases in Afghanistan anymore

                  There actually are several NATO installations still in and around Kabul to secure the international airport and the US Embassy.

                  It’s conducting war games that completely surround Taiwan.

                  The US also conducts war games across the South China Sea, including between China and Japan and through the Chinese territorial waters in and around the Korean peninsula. These have become tit-for-tat exercises, and would stop if the US was no longer in the region.

                  It’s claiming a ridiculous area for it’s EEZ

                  Glances at the US base map Yes. Ridiculous.

                  It’s sinking fishing vessels in international water

                  Show your work. When did China conduct a military operation to sink a fishing vessel?

                  It’s hacking the government systems of it’s neighbors

                  I’m sure they’ll quit right after the NSA does.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Buddy. There are no more NATO forces in Afghanistan. The Embassy was evacuated. Bagram was evacuated. Years ago now.

                    And why is China punishing Taiwan for American war games? They have plenty of ocean to use. And are you now claiming Jeju Island for China?

                    Our bases are not an Exclusionary Economic Zone. The Nine Dashed Line is indefensible.

                    Oh, now I need to prove stuff after you show up with a gilded lily of a meme masquerading as a map?

                    And I don’t dispute that the CIA hacks governments. I also don’t pretend it’s going to make them our friend or blame those countries for seeking protection from the CIA.

            • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Why would China engage in military conflict with the USA when they can just sit back and watch the USA collapse on its own?

    • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      Without America the Palestine people would have starved to death years ago. Their own Arabian brothers won’t even help them. America doesn’t need to institionalize islamaphobia when they do it themselves. You can look into any Islam media and you would find they actively burn u.s. flags on state media and call for our destruction. Nothing was needed to justify your made up war crimes in any of those countries because they all started the wars. Japan bombed pearl harbor. North Korea invaded South Korea. Vietnam Gulf of tonkin. Etc etc.

      • BigLgame@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lol fuck off with that hard angle, also the Gulf of Tonkin was a false flag.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The fun thing with Tonkin is it doesn’t even need to be a false flag, it can credibly be explained by a bad radar return. I don’t know which is is a worse basis to get 400,000 Americans Killed? (Including Agent Orange and Suicide numbers)

        • ashar@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Haha that was funny. Mentioning the Gulf of Tonkin incident as justification for war and really meaning it

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Without America, Palestine would be united and free by now. A single multicultural country from the river to the sea that can recognize and celebrate its diverse people and history. Instead though we have a genocidal European colony.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Without America the Palestine people would have starved to death years ago. Their own Arabian brothers won’t even help them.

        Iran won’t help Palestine, but also Iran is the shadowy hand behind Hamas.

        Egypt won’t help Palestine, but the CIA/MI5 need to coup the elected government every decade or three when it gets to Muslim Brotherhood-y.

        Lebanon won’t help Palestine, but Israel says there are tunnels into Gaza from Lebanon so they need to start bombing again.

        Turkyie won’t help Palestine, but the IDF had to murder Turkish aid workers in 2010 to prevent their aid flotilla from reaching the shore.

        • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          So Palestinians are Hamas?
          Why is Iran not helping Fatah?
          Their support of Hamas is on ideological grounds. Israel is holy waqf land that belongs to Muslims and should be cleansed from Jews.

          Even when Egypt had sovereignty over Gaza they made sure to prevent Palestinians from going to Egypt.

          Tunnels from Lebanon… to Gaza…? Where’d you read that?
          Hezbollah begun bombing Israel in support of Hamas. They’re also funded by Iran (much more than Hamas though).
          Meanwhile Palestinians live in camps in Lebanon. Some of those walled and surrounded by watchtowers.
          They have less rights there than anyone else (including refugees and migrant workers), despite living there for 3 generations at this point.

          Turkey under Erdogan has been mostly hosting Hamas leaders while bombing Kurds in Syria.

          I don’t think much needs to be said about Assad.

          The only country in the area which actually helped Palestinians was Jordan. Although that also changed for a while after Black September.

          Most of UNRWA’s funding over the years has come from the EU and USA.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Israel is holy waqf land that belongs to Muslims and should be cleansed from Jews.

            That’s crazy because I’ve heard Israelis assert the exact opposite.

            Most of UNRWA’s funding over the years has come from the EU and USA.

            There’s a certain dramatic irony in funding UNRWA, paying Israel to bomb UNRWA, and then claiming you’re the only folks providing aid to Palestinians.

            • Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s crazy because I’ve heard Israelis assert the exact opposite.

              Yes, religious extremists exist also in Israel.

              There’s a certain dramatic irony in funding UNRWA, paying Israel to bomb UNRWA, and then claiming you’re the only folks providing aid to Palestinians.

              I’m not the one who wrote USA is the only one providing aid.
              What you quoted is the reality. The bulk of the funding over the years has been from the USA and the EU.

        • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Iran won’t help Palestine, but also Iran is the shadowy hand behind Hamas.

          Your point being what? That they fund Hamas so they’re helping?

          Egypt won’t help Palestine, but the CIA/MI5 need to coup the elected government every decade or three when it gets to Muslim Brotherhood-y.

          Somehow Egypt helps them by having secret govt backed coups? Instead they could have just taken in refugees but why would they do that? They’ll just have a coup instead.

          Lebanon won’t help Palestine, but Israel says there are tunnels into Gaza from Lebanon so they need to start bombing again.

          So Lebanon helps the Palestine people by building tunnels where Hamas stored weapons and hostages?

          Turkyie

          I recall the Turkish police raiding those same charity offices accusing them of being linked to Islamic terrorists.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Your point being what? That they fund Hamas so they’re helping?

            Uh… Literally yes. Palestinian Islamist resistance is the only notable resistance movement in Palestine.

            Somehow Egypt helps them by having secret govt backed coups? Instead they could have just taken in refugees but why would they do that? They’ll just have a coup instead.

            My man the Egyptian government is an American puppet what are you talking about?

            So Lebanon helps the Palestine people by building tunnels where Hamas stored weapons and hostages?

            Literally yes. See above.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        LO-fuckin-L at using Gulf of Tonkin, a well known false flag operation meant solely to draw the US into a protracted conflict we had no business being in. 🤡

        • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean sure maybe the August 4th incident was overblown but the August 2nd 1964 incident did happen where our ship was attacked by Vietnam torpedo boats. Maybe you get attacked and don’t do shit at all about it who is the real clown there?

              • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                The 6 day Israel-Arab war. A casualty was encourred and Israel pleaded it was an accidental casualty of war. They made concessions.

                The gulf of tonkin. Not a casualty but a calculated attack.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yep complete accident. Have you read any of the reports? The ship was broadcasting it’s nationality in every way possible. The only way it was a mistake was if the Israelis turned off all of their communications and fired with their eyes closed.

                  • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Yes indeed I did. It’s completely false the ship was broadcasting nationality in every way possible. The ship wasn’t even suppose to be as close as it was because they were experiencing multiple communication failures. Nice bullshit comment though.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Ohhhh got it, only one false flag attack was committed by the US. That means the war in Vietnam was justified.

            To be clear regarding “false flag” operations for anyone unaware: this entails attacking our own military in order to provide spurious cassus belli to enter a conflict we had no valid reason to enter. In this case, a civil war on the other side of the planet, in a bay we should never have been in to begin with.

            How stupid does a person need to be to think that, not only was the war in Vietnam justified, but that the Gulf of Tonkin false flag incident is that justification?

            • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Vietnam torpedo boats attacked our ship on August 2 1964. Deny that fact as much as you want. Our ship was in international waters when attacked. There were multiple justifications to get in that war I don’t really care to get into them. Tldr: We help our allies and protect democracy in the region.

              • pop@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                We help our allies and protect democracy in the region.

                LMAO. Your military protects interests of the billionaires and their economy. It has fuck all to do about democracy.

                But keep guzzling whatever you already are, those braincells aren’t going to repeat propaganda by itself.

                • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  South Vietnam allied. Democracy in the region couldn’t fall because it creates a domino effect where democracy looks week.

                  Wtf are you talking about billionaires. Our military protects the interests of all our allies especially European and Asian.

                • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You use re-vanced lmfao. Fuck outta here brokie. Just a sad propagandized loser who despises their own country.

                  • prole@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Lol nothing says confidence like going through someone’s comment history to try to find things to hurt them… Good think I’m not ashamed of either of those things.

                    And just to clarify the latter: criticizing your own country because of the awful things it is doing ≠ hate. Usually it’s literally the opposite. If I despised my country, I wouldn’t be so distraught as I watch it being sold for parts for next to nothing.

                    🤡 👟👟

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You can look into any Islam media and you would find they actively burn u.s. flags on state media and call for our destruction.

        Well yes. Do you have any idea how much US neo-colonialism has harmed the Middle East over the past 70 years? Your country supports ISIS for fuck’s sake go touch some grass.

        Also why do you think their Muslim brothers won’t help them? Surely not because most of the Arab world is run by American puppets.