This is a really valid point, especially because it’s not only faster but dramatically cheaper.

The thing is, summaries which are pretty terrible might be costly. If decision makers are relying on these summaries and they’re inaccurate, then the consequences might be immeasurable.

Suppose you’re considering 2 cars, one is very cheap but on one random day per month it just won’t start, the other is 5x the price but will work every day. If you really need the car to get to work, then the one that randomly doesn’t start might be worse than no car at all.

Lots of people do lots of things.

I have a second sim card for my phone. I just turn off that sim when I’m not working, and set my status as away for group chat.

In this context, there isn’t any tangible benefit to having a second phone.

I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s how it plans out.

A regular group chat and another signal one for when you specifically need to talk to OP.

Having two phones absolutely sucks. Didn’t work for me at all.

Getting wasted in bars and clubs is not how one finds quality life partners.

Similarly, if no one is into you, that might be because the core of your identity is feeling desperately lonely while getting drunk in bars and clubs.

I thought they more or less already did that? Although perhaps not at the UN.

They’ve already been making out that it’s an unacceptable act of aggression by Ukraine.

Next up:

• someone falls out a window
• Putin with mysterious illness, photos of him sitting many metres away across a stupidly long table.
• they will launch the nukes if other countries don’t stop supporting Ukraine.

What. The. Fuck.

So they just don’t certify results they don’t like.

The three board members who voted for it – Dr Janice Johnson, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King – were praised by name three days ago by Donald Trump at an Atlanta campaign rally.

This smells like corruption.

Obviously. Why is that threatened by this antitrust ruling ?

Yep. Guaranteed they’ve already figured out the specific people they need to put pressure on when the time comes.

This article doesn’t even bother to explain the connection. I don’t get it if I’m honest.

So that makes odysee’s behaviour OK?

Yeah it really does seem this way.

I’ve never been a “free speech absolutist”. I acknowledge that censorship is problematic, but it seems much less so than the alternative.

There’s no way in hell I will ever own a toothbrush with any sort of connectivity, but electric toothbrushes really are pretty great. Teeth feel way cleaner.

I’ve heard the sonic ones are amazing because they can clean the pockets between the gum and tooth… never had the money for that though.

Our rice cooker’s only “logic” is a spring that lifts the bowl off the element once enough water has evaporated.

I honestly wish I could look away and just be blissfully ignorant. Fuck I’m not even American.

I don’t think that’s what it means.

A depiction which is authentic might refer to provenance.

If someone authorises me to make a pornographic depiction of them, surely that’s not illegal. It’s authentic.

So it’s not a question of whether the depiction appears to be AI generated, it’s really about whether a reasonable person would conclude that the image is a depiction of a specific person.

That means tattoos, extra limbs, third books, et cetera won’t side step this law.

Kagi & DDG already have their own ai stuff

If you can’t see the difference between these things then I can’t help you.

Incentivising sterilisation is literally eugenics.