• Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    If steam did allow transfers this way, I can imagine it being a new type scam where people fabricate death documents to steal steam accounts.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      True but ultimately this is about ownership - we don’t own our games. We license them - that is what is lost with Steam and DRM, and moving away from physical media.

      GOG is an alternative in that you can download and back up the installers for your games (mostly) but even then do you own your ganes?

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’ve never owned your games. You owned the media they came on but legally you only ever had a license to use the software. Depending on the license agreement (the thing where most people click “I agree” without reading) you had more or fewer rights, such as transfer of license, but the way things work legally ownership of software seems to mean the more of the copyright ownership. Maybe like a book: you own your copy of the book but you don’t have the rights to print more books or make a movie based on the book.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          With physical media those licenses didn’t materially matter though because a contract you can’t read until after a purchase is automatically void in court.

          • piccolo@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Copyright is automatically applied rather you want it or not. Licenses are granting you permissions to use the media without violating their Copyright. Having a physical copy simply means a publisher cant restrict access to your copy because they turned off their servers… (atleast before the age of zero day patches…).

              • piccolo@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Actually the original meaning was the way I intended.

                The term “zero-day” originally referred to the number of days since a new piece of software was released to the public, so “zero-day software” was obtained by hacking into a developer’s computer before release.

                • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Using “updated” terms intending them as their original meaning is not usually the best plan… Like me saying “that’s an awful haircut” but using awful as the near synonym for awesome.

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Which is why those license agreements generally had a clause that if you disagreed you could return the software with all the media for a full refund.

            I’m not saying it’s the right way, just that’s how it’s been structured legally. Of course, in the days of physical media with software that couldn’t phone home it was harder to enforce those licenses if people didn’t strictly adhere to them. The software companies didn’t generally find it worth going after individuals if they found out about violations either. Corporations, on the other hand… I worked once at a media company that Adobe caught running a lot of unlicensed software. The story went that it was so bad at the main office their auditors found a copy of After Effects or something similarly ridiculous on a computer that was used as a cash register in the corporate cafeteria. That was very much worth Adobe’s time and money to get the lawyers involved, and became a very expensive problem for my employer. I wasn’t involved in the problem, but I had to check and clean my local office, where we found about a half-dozen computers with unlicensed software.

            • Aceticon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              It makes no difference.

              They’re trying to impose an obligation or task on a customer after the purchase, even if it’s only the customer having to go through the trouble of getting the refund (which is a task they were not informed about before the purchase).

              If it’s not before the sale it’s void and even in some cases before the sale (for example bait and switch, were you’re mislead with fake contract conditions until the last minute) it’s void.

              The whole point is that they must be clear upfront about any conditions attached when the customer is making the decision to buy and adding any conditions after the sale is not acceptable even if the seller gives options (such as refunds) because the customer has a right to use the product under the conditions at the time of the sale and cannot legally be forced otherwise, including forced to refund.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Realistically, the transfer would likely need to be set up ahead of time via the account holder. For instance, my password manager has a function to allow me to designate a beneficiary. But importantly, that beneficiary assignment must come from my account before I die. If I die without designating a beneficiary, there’s nothing my family can do to gain access to my password vault. Only the accounts I have designated will be able to gain access.

      In other words, in order to falsely designate a beneficiary, they would already need access to my account. And at that point, they wouldn’t need to deal with death certificates and beneficiaries, because they already have access to my account.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh for sure, but it’s definitely a concern for stuff like this. It’s a lot easier for valve to just expect people to pass login info down as a way to pass on an account.

        Valve actually migrating purchases from one account to another risks upsetting publishers, and requires whole new policies on how to verify death and verify who should receive the account. Finally there’s the risk of scams and having to resolve them. Overall it’s a lot of headache for valve, I’m not surprised they’re not jumping to offer it officially.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        6 months ago

        New tinder bio: “need a woman to birth me a child that will inherit my Steam account on the day of my demise”

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Between my birthday of 1/1/1901 and unlicensed game inheritance, shit is going to go down in the next 50 years. We’ll have AI legal reps for powerful firms requesting a statement of all software licenses by the deceased, challenging them, and then having a court order the rest null.

      I hate that I will be right about that.

    • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Will valve allow accounts to exist indefinitely? Will they create an expiration policy, like accounts being closed after 100 years

  • banana_lama@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh I didn’t own my steam account it was created for my future children. it’s a trust.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol. That’s hilarious. But unfortunately you never owned the games in the first place. You rented the privilege to play the game for life?..life of the rental company or your life only? Oh man, we gotta go thru the small print on this.

        • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Purchased should mean what it means for other things like cars or apples…you get a copy of an apple via a purchase and you are guaranteed to be able to use that apple in any manner you please. So for example, you could eat it, ferment it, store it in resin for posterity and for future humans to recreate it. There aren’t any limits to a purchase. So I agree, maybe we need ask the supremes of the supreme court if purchasing means different things. So if I purchase sex from a prostitute legally in Las Vegas, does that prostitute need to specifically state what activities I will own? Or if I go to Costco and buy a fried chicken, does Costco need to specifically state that the chicken is not just a rental but a final exchange between you and Costco, money for dead poultry. More relatable, a screw driver from home Depot, that thing will last a few uses, so do you still own it if home Depot goes down? Can you still rotate screws with it?

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Software can be both a product and a service:

            • it’s a product when running on my computer (i.e. the game)
            • it’s a service when running on their computer (i.e. providing the hosting for downloading, multiplayer client-server hosting).


            The issue preventing one practically enacting on software is that copyright defaults to preventing you redistributing it, and you need the source code to be able to modify (fully). Thankfully some games are free software/open source when you can act on your ownership.

            • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              So that should be “I purchased a game” when you got a detached product that is functional forever… unless the makers make a deal with Microsoft to fuck it up on the next illegally forced update or with Nvidia to change the next card such that it is unplayable.

              And it should be “I purchased…I subscribed to this online game” when you know that shit is not yours, so don’t expect it to last.

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                That would at least be more honest… from my perspective anyway. The games industry has done this for so long that this is the norm for generatations who grew up with consoles being online - this is “purchasing” to some as words have usages and not inate meaning.

                It would be better if they just stopped doing that but you get more money that way.

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          “yes, you made a purchase. But what you purchased were tickets. Tickets to specific rides at a theme park. You did not buy the rides. You bought tickets for the rides. Those tickets are valid for your personal use. If you are not the one using them, they are not to be used.” –Their argument in court probably.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can resell Windows CD keys legally in the EU as the courts rejected the “only for you” part of the argument: invalidating that part of the EULA. I probably have the right to resell my Steam game tickets.

      • banana_lama@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        I understand for the life of the company. But it’s not even my steam account. It’s my child’s who’s currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they’ll enjoy.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Do they check? Or can i just give my password to my homie in a letter

    "Dear homie,

    if you are reading this, it means that i’m on the long path to meet with master Kaio to train my ass off to death in the afterlife. Until we meet again, this is my user and pass of my steam account.

    PS: i didn’t bought the porno VR games. Someone gifted them to me.

    Your bro in eternity,

    Siegfried"

    • udon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bro, but what about the credit card receipt for porno VR games, signed by Siegfried? What about the warranty card for the porno VR games, filled out by Siegfried? What about the book “Porno VR Games and Me (This Sort of Thing is my Bag, Baby!)” by Siegfried?

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    6 months ago

    “And to my son, I bequeath my steam account - user is blah and password is blah”

    Checkmate steam

    • LemmyFeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      The article goes into that and states password sharing is against the Eula so technically they can kick you off the service if they find out… IF they find out wink wink

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Old and busted: Pretending someone’s alive for their Social Security check

        New hotness: Pretending someone’s alive for their Steam account

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          4 generations later: “I’ve inherited my father’s steam account just as he inherited it from his father and so on. The library has grown ever larger, and yet so many remain untouched. The summer sales have sustained my forefathers and yet I feel hollow. Each year, more games are added to this historic account, but each year brings more regret as the purchases go untouched. I shall make a promise to myself: finish the extensive library, honor my family, complete the library. But first, some more Counter Strike.”

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    6 months ago

    When you’re dead but someone has got into your steam account and is about to find all of your anime titty games

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I have reached a place where I genuinely don’t care about anyone seeing my browser history.

        FBI: “Mr. JoMiran, did you spend an hour browsing through Peggy Hill cosmic horror hentai?”

        Me: “Meh. I found most of the tentacle detail work lacking and the exaggerated breast size off-putting.”

  • Reminds_Me_Of_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 months ago

    Who’s notifying Valve someone with an account has died? Link the dead person’s account to a steam family and enjoy the inheritance.

      • telllos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re account is tied to an email address, you just give the email address as well.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you will a steam account to someone, there is a chance that there are disputes/claims for the account that need to be settled in court.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      The interesting question is what happens if Valve is still around after all of us are long gone and there are millions of 150+ year old accounts, many under active use?

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        In a world that isn’t drowning in late stage capitalism what we call that is the overwhelming gift given to us by the generations before us so that we may in turn give it to the next generation. Video games are only a tiny subsection of those gifts compared to everything else we just get handed for free.

        Wealthy US boomers brutally executed that way of looking at the world though, so literally any form of passing on gifts to the next generation other than being rich as fuck and directly leaving an unbelievable amount of money to your kids is unfathomable or framed as unfair or absurd in modern day society.

  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Assuming that the world continues to exist in a way that lets me have a steam account at the time of my natural lifespans average end (another… 46 years):

    My steam library grows at a slower rate than my mass storage has, and I’m quite confident that one will be able to fit my entire steam library as it currently is on a normal and affordable drive in at most 15 years.

    With those two facts in play I can remain confident in my ability to crack everything I own (assuming I even want everything) and safely store it for at-will passing down to as many people as I want.

    But thanks for the reminder to not blindly trust you, Valve. Always useful to have those.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just because it is wrong and obviously contradictory to other established precedents doesn’t at this point mean that it won’t be enforced unfortunately.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Valve is a business, they don’t give a shit about vibes, when Valve gets sold off and it will one day (probably sooner than we expect) none of these “vibes” or “culture” are going to matter one single tiny little bit.

          That is the point of this whole system, we receive assurances up down left right and in every which direction that entities like Valve won’t be ripped up and destroyed by venture capital, private equity, or whatever the fuck the current grift the 1% has us in… and they are empty promises by design.

          A company is not legally defined as the will of its creator/creators, rather the labor and particular genius of a company’s workers is purposefully rationalized into a structure that we are supposed to accept is fundamentally designed to be ripped from our hands brutally because “that is just how the adult world works, shut up and get back to work”.

          Justification of unnecessary violence and destruction is one of the primary products of the system.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Less about enforcement than ease of transfer. If I’ve got a Steam account and you’ve got a Steam account and I die, Steam won’t let you transfer the licenses from my account to yours. You just have to maintain two independent accounts now - accounts with 2-factor authentication that you also have to maintain (so second cell numbers and emails, etc).

      Steam will simply let the administrative burden of juggling extra accounts take these licenses out of the pool.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Does steamworks not have a notion of a parent organization or enterprise? That’s what most other design and development tools do.

      If someone leaves, the parent enterprise remains, and new people can be added to the enterprise and can be granted rights over the content.