• set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    VERGE articles seem to be getting worse over the years, they’ve almost reached Forbes level, yes this does raise some valid safety concerns. No Tesla isn’t bad just because it’s Tesla.

    It doesn’t really give us the full picture. For starters, there’s no comparison with Level 2 systems from other car makers, which also require driver engagement and have their own methods to ensure attention. This would help us understand how Tesla’s tech actually measures up.

    Plus, the piece skips over extremely important stats that would give us a clearer idea of how safe (or not) Tesla’s systems are compared to good old human driving.

    We’re left in the dark about how Tesla compares in scenarios like drunk, distracted, or tired driving—common issues that automation aims to mitigate. (probably on purpose).

    It feels like the article is more about stirring up feelings against Tesla rather than diving deep into the data. A more genuine take would have included these comparisons and variables, giving us a broader view of what these technologies mean for road safety.

    I feel like any opportunity to jump on the Elon hate wagon is getting tiresome. (and yes i hate Elon too).

    • WormFood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      a more genuine take would have included a series of scenarios (e.g. drunk/distracted/tired driving)

      I agree. they did tesla dirty. a more fair comparison would’ve been between autopilot and a driver who was fully asleep. or maybe a driver who was dead?

      and why didn’t this news article contain a full scientific meta analysis of all self driving cars??? personally, when someone tells me that my car has an obvious fault, I ask them to produce detailed statistics on the failure rates of every comparable car model

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It only matters if the autopilot does more kills than an average human driver on the same distance traveled.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      this is bullshit.

      A human can be held accountable for their failure, bet you a fucking emerald mine Musk won’t be held accountable for these and all the other fool self drive fuckups.

      • sabin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        So you’d rather live in a world where people die more often, just so you can punish the people who do the killing?

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s a terrifically misguided interpretation of what I said, wow.

          LISTEN UP BRIGHT LIGHTS, ACCOUNTABILITY ISN’T A LUXURY. It’s not some ‘nice to have add-on’.

          Musk’s gonna find out. Gonna break all his fanboys’ hearts too.

          • sabin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Nothing was misguided and if anything your tone deaf attempt to double down only proves the point I’m making.

            This stopped being about human deaths for you a long time ago.

            Let’s not even bother to ask the question of whether or not this guy could ultimately be saving lives. All that matters to you is that you have a target to take your anger out on the event that a loved one dies in an accident or something.

            You are shallow beyond belief.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              This stopped being about human deaths for you a long time ago.

              Nope, it’s about accountability. The fact that you can’t see how important accountability is just says you’re a musk fan boy. If Musk would shut the fuck up and do the work, he’d be better off - instead he’s cheaping out left and right on literal life dependent tech, so tesla’s stock gets a bump. It’s ridiculous, like your entire argument.

              • sabin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I don’t give a fuck about musk. I think hos Hyperloop is beyond idiotic and nothing he makes fucking works. In fact I never even said I necessarily think the state of Tesla autopilot is acceptable. All I said was that categorically rejecting autopilot (even for future generations where tech can be much better) for the express purpose of being able to prosecute people is beyond empty and shallow.

                If you need to make up lies about me and strawman me to disagree you only prove my point. You stopped being a rational agent who weighs the good and bad of things a long time ago. You don’t care about how good the autopilot is or can be. All you care about is your mental fixation against the CEO of the company in question.

                Your political opinions should be based on principles, not whatever feels convenient in the moment.

  • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love to hate on musky boi as much as the next guy, but how does this actually compare to vehicular accidents and deaths overall? CGP Grey had the right idea when he said they didn’t need to be perfect, just as good as or better than humans.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      CGP Grey also seems to believe self driving cars with the absence of traffic lights is the solution to traffic as opposed to something like trains.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        /c/fuckcars is that way, thanks for stopping by

        Cars will never be dethroned. Yes, trains are cool - choo choo motherfucker. Yes, bikes are environmentally friendly. Yes, the car is a truly fucking horible answer to the question “how to get from A to B”.

        But that’s because cars are the answer to the question “how to get from A to B comfortably”. I don’t want my baby and my in-law to get on the back of my bike when we’re going camping. I don’t want to take the train and then walk 2 miles from the station every single fucking day with 20kg of tools in my hand, because shit, the train doesn’t stop next to my house, and it doesn’t stop next to my work. I want to be able to have acces to comfortable transportation.

        So the answer will still be the car. Even with everyone crying about it. Cause the cat’s out of the bag with cars, we made them efficient and cheap enough to not be considered luxury items anymore. And some countries (see: US) have their entire infrastructure built with cars in mind. You’re never putting the lid back on this, even if it’s a decent idea.