• Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    refused to use ai voices

    Have we just started handing out awards for anything that isn’t AI? They didn’t use ai for this! They didn’t use ai for that! Like okay we get it, how about just list what they did use AI for and be done with it

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      At this rate we are in fact going to need to have separate awards shows for non-LLM artistry.

      To answer your question, though, it’s more than just the refusal but the addition of an anti-AI story campaign.

  • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe a good balance could be a human voice actor for main dialogue, supported by ai trained on their main dialogue to voice sidequest and deep lore dialogue. It could enable fully voiced dialogue-heavy games that would otherwise be too expensive to produce, something like generative RPGs or Morrowind, if all the books could be voiced, and more easily translated while remaining fully voiced. But keeping humans to fill the main campaign contributions, emotional beats and determine character personality. I’m just comparing Morrowind to Oblivion, which was voiced, but the dialogue and conversation trees were heavily reduced in volume as a result.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe a good balance would be hiring a person to speak lines into a microphone. It could employ a person and create art with an acceptable bare minimum quality standard. If you can’t afford that and would rather push the costs onto government subsidies for power and emissions, maybe instead just do text dialogue or pull a classic Banjo and Kazooie single dialogue line randomly jumbled up and pitch shifted for every interaction.

      • richmondez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I assume you also only buy hand crafted porcelain items, only buy hand picked produce and generally avoid all automation amd modern convenience. Take your clothes to a local hand-wash rather than using a washing machine too do you? I agree that the energy cost should be taken into account before we declare it to be cheaper to use “AI” generated content.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          If vases at the store were Handcrafted by LLMs, as if that made any fucking sense, then I’d rather go without, yeah.

          • richmondez@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Like LLMs just spontaneously create lines of audio? They need a human operator to direct them to generate audio just like machines that make most vases are human operated but allow the person to make far more and more quickly than they would by hand. An LLM is still just a tool that needs a person to wield it, it doesn’t replace them it just changes their role and makes them more efficient.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Using machine learning to clone voices required building upon millions or maybe even billions of lines of dialogue to reach the current point, and only now that it is here can you easily approximate a person’s voice without them even knowing. So yes, it does magically generate sound with minimal input, that is how that works.

              The machines that are currently used to shape and paint ceramics are not Machine Learning models. They’re simple and precise automations. Like a program that packages audio to .mp3 format. The equivalent to that would be a machine that designs the vase based on thousands of older examples, designs the packaging, and designs the machinery that prepares it. It’s going to do a shit job that negatively impacts consumers but in the process it displaced thousands of workers in one go, so enjoy the profits.

              • richmondez@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You missed the point of what I said. Machines that manufacture goods put many people out of the job and yet you now very few people think that is an issue. At the time however the same kind of arguments I see made against LLMs putting people out of work were being made about these machines making soulless products that missed the human touch. LLMs are just a new tool we’ve invented to make life easier for ourselves. In time the same thing will happen with LLMs once the hype dies down and they just become part of the tool sets we all use without thinking about it.