I know :) But here I have a special reason to care, which is too complex to explain in a short comment.
I know :) But here I have a special reason to care, which is too complex to explain in a short comment.
INB4 “but what about female circumsision”
If I could convince my friend to stop smoking.
The bartender first peacefully told the Nazi to leave, and after the Nazi refused, the bartender threatened them with the bat, without actually using it. Do you really not see the difference from randomly punching someone on the street as you walk past them?
Or would you also say that there is no difference between a police officer threatening someone with a gun after they refuse arrest, versus immediately shooting them on sight?
Of course if someone uses violence, you can use violence back. You’re arguing against a strawman.
Okay, but what does this have to do with punching? No violence took place in this scenario.
But what even is a “gender expression” if not linked to sex? Why not just call it a personality trait?
Enropean cities also have “bad parts” despite having a completely different history.
The question said literally nothing about race. The racism is in your head.
I’d like to hear someone pronounce it as [stɹɛŋgθs] without choking.
I’d just like to be able to talk about everyday stuff without someone complaining about capitalism.
Those who are currently in a bus or airplane would probably die.
I definitely agree that it’s mutilation. I was pointing out the whataboutism that occurs every time someone talks about male circumsision.