Nazis aren’t really known for being smart. The thought process goes like this:

• America is shit
• (Too cowardly to actually plan an assault against the institutions they hate)
• A race war will solve things
• Something has to start a race war
• Attack unguarded substations and cause blackouts
• ???
• Race war.
• ???
• White, Christian monocultural ethnostate.

Here are my walking distances in Seattle:

• Convenience store: 150m
• Chain supermarket: 30m
• Big supermarket: 1.6km
• Bus stop: 10m
• Park: 100m
• Library: 150m
• Train station: 2km

Straight-line distance to Space Needle: 4.3km

You can’t even threaten to murder everyone around you anymore…

lol

and also

lmao

It’s a joke suggesting medical fraud where there isn’t any. Not a very funny joke…

Whatever brand of Socialism/Communism you advocate for that denies the sick and dying a dignified death, you can keep it.

The prohibition on public exposure of breasts by women and girls over 10 years old is now gone from the city code as of this week.

I never thought I’d be conflicted on this, because I am absolutely of the opinion that female breasts and nipples shouldn’t be treated as exclusively sexual body parts, especially since men have them too and we aren’t held to that standard.

But being confronted with the idea that 10-17 year old girls can now bare their breasts in public without restraint reminds me that treating female bodies as non-sexual is great as an ethos, but it is not reflective of reality, and that this specifically could be problematic.

But how to solve it? You can’t make it an 18+ only rule, or you’re further entrenching the idea that female breasts are exclusively sexual and adult, but if you let teens and tweens go topless, they will be sexualized / ogled / photographed by adult men, and that’s a bad precedent to set as acceptable. We usually treat photographs of underage female breasts as a form of CSAM, but can we still say that if we’re treating female breasts as non-sexual? This is an interesting new line to draw, given societal attitudes on adolescent nudity.

Regretfully, I believe that the true problem is men. The reason women have to cover their breasts is because they have to protect themselves from men. I’m all for bodily liberation and the de-sexualization of female existence, but we need an overhaul on our society’s attitudes towards women in general if we’re going to get there. Maybe bare breasts help get us there. Maybe girls need to learn the right way how to kick a man in the balls before they go topless.

It’s still a rape joke. Your laughter has been noted.

Yeah, this place finally became Reddit.

I love this kind of delusional statement.

“Researchers spent tens of billions of dollars, and put decades into research, and now that there is breakthrough progress in applied machine learning, but we should bury all knowledge of it and abandon the entire sector because of vibes.”

Scepticism of AI businesses and hype is perfectly understandable, but you’re not putting this cat back in the bag…

I’ve owned one of those. It’s a piece of shit.

Look, if Excel is the last mile and everyone is properly plugged into a corporate database to pull numbers, then great.

But way too many companies manage everything from a network share full of xlsx files…

All names are made up.

It is incredibly stupid that the Passport office thinks that this is a copyright issue, but the parents logic is also baffling…

“We understand that Loki’s middle name is copyrighted, but we have no intention of using it for personal gain."

So you gave a child a name that they themselves won’t be able to use for “personal gain” when they grow up? Acknowledging the inherent limitations of a name like this just sounds like you willfully set your kid up for failure.

Sounds to me like a case of parents treating their child like an accessory. You’re not raising a child, you’re raising a future adult. Maybe don’t give them a legal name that is also a corporate brand name?

Sure, but America doesn’t really seem to be the best at alternatives to shooting…

If humans had any respect at all for the natural world, they’d feed themselves to the bear.

I know that actual game mechanics cannot be patented or copyrighted

In America, sure. But these are two Japanese companies…

I’m not an expert on Japanese copyright and patent law, but I don’t have a great outlook for Palworld.

Our wetware neutral networks probably aren’t supposed to engage with synthetic content like this either. In a few years we’re gonna learn that overexposure to AI generated content creates some sort of neurological problem in people, like a real-world “nerve attenuation syndrome” (Johnny Mnemonic).

Look at him now disappearing a cow Marjory Stewart-Baxter, you taste like sunshine dust Godzilla took a bite out of Optimus Prime Like Scruff McGruff took a bite out of crime we are here to protect you from the terrible secret of space

skibidi ain’t got nothing on the Newgrounds / Something Awful brainrot.