I only know of Andorra from The Cloak
I only know of Andorra from The Cloak
You joke, but a calcified fetus in the womb for years is possible. It was a bizarre read, i don’t remember the condition’s name.
Your comment reads far more arrogant than the one you responded to.
Lol is everyone who pushes your buttons a nazi?
People were also a lot more open to their data being used by machine learning because it was used in universally appreciable tasks like image classification or image upscaling; tasks no human would want to do manually and which threatens nobody.
The difference today is not the data used, but the threat from the use-case. Or, more accurately, people don’t mind their data being used if they know the outcome is of universal benefit.
The issue isn’t the final, individual art pieces, it’s the scale. An AI can produce sub-par art quickly enough to threaten the livelyhood of artists, especially now that there is far too much art for anyone to consume and appreciate. AI art can win attention via spam, drowning out human artists.
21 is very specific
Well, the meme photo has many upvotes, so you are right.
I’m interested in figuring out why he would switch positions to such a large degree. If it were truly to prevent backlash, he would have said something sooner and appear neutral.
I’m defending him because I enjoy the art he makes and think he’s as capable as you or I of self improvement, and because I want to encourage others to do the same.
Or maybe he realized he was wrong and decided to do the right thing. The dude went to a birthright trip in his 20s; it makes sense he would have started out in support of Israel.
Eric Andre specifically came out in support of Palestine
The motion blur is too good, as well as the surrounding geometry. Then again, AI pics are getting more realistic
My apologies, I did not read the article on the assumption Meta would choose the irresponsible option. The article was surprisingly nuanced, and I hope the enforcement of Meta’s policies are equally nuanced.
Isn’t it incredibly dangerous to ban “Zionist” only because it’s misused? It can be used to legitimately describe people who have a vested interest in Isreal occupying Palestine. I understand it’s used as a slur, but banning otherwise normal words will make the discourse much more difficult.
They expanded on the world building and action superbly, but Lucas isn’t a people person, and it shows
That’s not the sexist part, you have to read more. One Tweet can’t prove anything, but several Tweets are a clear pattern of behavior. Quoting the first sentence betrays your disinterest.
We ought to normalize this phrase, it’s pure gold!
No escape from reality
You go gay to straight jail, obviously!
A rubber room