Not 100% sure if it fits the “news” mandate of this community, but it is not “opinion”, but rather a nuanced explainer of the context of very recent news (by a scholar with expertise and lived experience on the subject) of the kind that would appear on the front page of a news outlet (the BBC for example had something similar on its front page yesterday).
Removed by mod
Americans, leash your fucking dog.
Making South Africa’s case, the bastards.
This is in Canada.
Are you a Vermonter?
I mean, that’s a literal statement of fact.
But various bros told me here on Lemmy that action at the international law level is meaningless.
Reminder that teenagers are children.
Strange how this talk of “collateral” damage only applies to when Israelis kill civilians and not when, say, Hamas or Hezbollah do it.
Using your own despicable and dehumanizing approach, October the 7th merely had 797 “collateral victims” for the 379 legitimate Israeli security forces targets. And after all, the 2:1 civilian to military casualties ratio is basically the same as the IDF’s own record in Gaza.
Ah what to do, such is war…
No.
Fuck that barbaric way of devaluing the loss of human life.
Source: IDF said trust me bro.
Netanyahu desperately needs a regional war. How many people must die so that this bag of shit doesn’t face an Israeli judge for his scandals?
If the third parties abide by Brazilian law, they should have legal representation in the country and therefore can be pursued for circumventing the law?
And your evidence that Israel only targetted active duty Hezbollah combattants?
What a load of ghoulish warmongering. Oh it’s war? If Hezbollah had done this to Israelis, the world would be crying blood and vowing for Israel’s right to defend itself.
Jew media
Fuck off.
So, like, are Israeli reservists fair game for terror attacks?
They have meant people not being killed, so I dunno, that’s something?