dude come on, I’ve seen this like 5 years ago

Article didn’t mention Brave either. I think it’s also blocked because Reddit is only allowing Google to scrap its website.

There are easier ways to check. Here is how i did it (no way there hasn’t been a trump reddit post in a week)

Also, rate limiting. A publicly accessible website doesn’t mean that it will allow scrapers to read millions of pages each week. They can easily identify and block scrapers because of the pattern of their activity. I don’t know if Reddit has rate-limiting, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they implement one.

I got you https://archive.ph/GS2I0

Old indexed results are fine. But anything from last week is not showing up

Duckduckgo uses Bing for links.

from : https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/

tbh I’ve never seen a Lemmy link when searching for stuff. Is it too small to show up? Or do search engines not index Lemmy instances?

That’s like saying Russian propaganda is okay because US army did a terrorist attack in Iraq. Propaganda is bad even if it’s directed at a “bad” country or whatever

This is not world news. This is a propaganda opinion article. Which shouldn’t appear on world news community.

Additionally, Mondoweiss.net is just anti-israel propaganda site: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mondoweiss/ . That’s their whole shtick. Don’t believe what they say about Israel in the same way you shouldn’t believe what russian RT says about how the west is falling

Data source: WIkipedia??? Wikipedia is not a source ffs

wtf is this journalism??? one guy on twitter said that so now its confirmed. Just tried it and works fine. Do people just upvote this because they hate Elon Musk and want this to be true?

Update: He endorsed Harris: https://nitter.poast.org/JoeBiden/status/1815087772216303933#m

haha cybertruck is shit! super original joke that I am not tired of hearing

That’s really cool

99% was referring to them not being both tech savy and extremely privacy conscious. I don’t disagree that the appeal of Firefox is better privacy. I just don’t think the average user is looking to absolutely remove every drop of data collected. I mean just look at the default Firefox homepage it comes with. It has sponsored shortcuts and sponsored stories. They put them there because the average user actually clicks on them. If everyone was privacy conscious like you say, they would turn off the feature and Firefox wouldn’t keep it because they don’t make money from it. But that’s obviously not the case.

I mean it might not be the most performant. But I’ve build with React and it made it easier to build projects quickly. Regardless, my point wasn’t about React and if it’s good or bad. My point was that Meta can build a framework that’s not about collecting data. Sometimes they have other motives.

Here I think the reason they are co-authoring this is to try to paralyze Google’s hold on personalized ads and user data. And probably reduce scrutiny of their data collecting actions in the sense that their new data collecting will be based on PPA if it goes mainstream.

Super welcoming community here. Disagree with them they immediately want you out. Anyways, React is not a programming language, it’s a framework built on Javascript. My point was that hating on anything Meta built is stupid because they can build ok things

Meta bad!!! Wait until you realise that React is built by Meta. Are you gonna stop using websites that is built on React?

I mean people freaking out about this don’t actually understand what’s happening and why Mozilla is doing it. Mozilla is trying to build a new privacy-based advertising. The feature needs to be opt-in by default in order to have a chance to become mainstream. Forget about the technical details and whether the user understands what it is. Most people don’t change default settings. So they can never get websites to try this better technology if their own users aren’t adopting it.

I also hate the attitude of this community they think Firefox is built for them(ultra tech savy, extremely privacy concious) when 99% of their users are not these things. If you want ultra privacy, go use Libreawolf or whatever. Those solutions are for that type of person. Firefox and Mozilla builds for the average person, which is why they correctly say that the user won’t understand the feature. (Anyone says otherwise is in a tech bubble and haven’t seen normal people interacting with their computers).