There is no humane way, they all fuck up. Most people who actually support the death penalty want recipients to suffer.

Then why do you use Lemmy/Reddit at all?

Were you expecting philosopher kings with a more advanced heuristic than “I don’t like this post”? The improvement is decentralization - that doesn’t make the users nice or smart.

That’s true, I just interpret “huh yuk I can mean the N word with this one weird trick” as racism. When the orcs are loud and boorish, that’s fine. When they love fried chicken and watermelon, it’s clearly a proxy.

We can do better. TrueSTL had a lot of “joking” real racism IMO.

Aye, I could do that.

It’s a little confusing because the image is cropped.

I was about to post a snarky reply about Star Trek as the exception, and then realized their bioconservatives won the “Eugenics Wars”.

He’s holding them back with his ego.

Ironically it was his scene in Waking Life that put him on my radar. I think he has literally gone insane.

I’m kinda tempted to buy something for the lulz. I used to like Jones a long time ago, and the proceeds will go towards Sandy Hook victims anyways.

Sounds like it’s time for the deniably encrypted phone.

Even locked if they want the info in your phone they are probably getting it. They would have access to some of the best forensics teams and equipment.

I think some of the concern is when cops will use force illegally and then lie about it, so they wouldn’t necessarily have access to forensics.

Good riddance, I hate Ai-generated art.

Patriots care. We just don’t have a lot of them in office - most people are for sale.

That would lose a ton of profits!

I’m warning potential readers about the scam you’re promoting. If you don’t care, then stop.

If a cryptocurrency involves trusting a central foundation at any point, it’s a scam. It’s an unnecessary security hole, and one would be damn foolish to invest in it just because the hole remains unused.

That’s whataboutism - a low carbon footprint doesn’t change whether or not Nano is a scam. My Excel spreadsheet has an even lower carbon footprint than the AI you’re pitching here. If they own a large enough majority to control the network, then they can dictate policy or favor their own blocks for free money.

What would be a controlling share with Nano?

51%

The largest representatives according to voting weight were the exchanges last time I checked

Which is irrelevant because holders can just choose different representatives.

So I mean, while I can’t prove that the foundation held more coins than they claimed, I’m unaware that there was ever a sign of them actually doing so.

The sign is them creating a design that expects this tremendous amount of trust. It’s extremely conspicuous to create a vulnerability that only the foundation can exploit, that can go undetected if they don’t make a huge mistake.

It has to come from somewhere, right? How would you fairly distribute coins that aren’t mined?

You can’t fairly distribute a premine. Don’t use coins with premines.

I’m glad you’re not here to shill Nano, but it is a scam and you are promoting it.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/premining.asp

You are one of those suckers if you believe every distributed coin was solved by a CAPTCHA. The centralized(!) foundation pinky promises that they didn’t sock puppet ten times as many suckers at launch, and then keep a controlling share of stake permanently.

A better way to do the initial “airdrop” is to not do centralized issuance at all, because anyone would be a complete fool to trust any crypto foundation.