it feels like that exception misses some context. I’m not familiar with kotlin, but it’s java-like and this exception cause seems unusual, like if this text would only be part of an exception chain, and if we wouldn’t see the inner (original) exception(s)
how did you obtain this?
there are credible news outlets, that’s not the problem. the problem is that the propagandists are everywhere. they literally own the state TV channels, and most if not all regional newspapers and their online versions. a lot of people only watch/read these, and even more of them only believe what these tell
when the subtitle does not match the same language translated voice line
to modify the license plate itself. but it’s surroundings? why?
or with a CD that installs a downloader, that is actually a background service always starting with the OS, and a few other bloatware to not waste CD space
except that almost nobody has a CD drive anymore. so it must be a pendrive instead that was forced to read-only access
based on the Internet Archive? would be fascinating, but does not look like it
soon “Available, Out of office, Single, Virgin, Allergic to milk”
why the fuck would you need VoLTE to the emergency services? is the high quality audio really oh so important or what?
it seems they are not checking on your phone anything. so custom roms would neither fix or break their presumed compatibility
ok, but as I understand that was not a topic in the parent comment
…yes, that’s what we’re discussing…
obviously not. what we are discussing is optional and voluntary, because it is removable
you definitely did not read my comment. but you know what! teach me Master!
why would I put that in the CSS??
so they are basically saying “nanana, I can’t here you! you can’t oblige me to do anything!”, and getting away with it?
“Not good enough” = not important to you
you have misunderstood something.
not good enough means the downsides highly, severely outweigh the upsides. It’s not that “I wouldn’t use it and then you shouldn’t have it either”, it’s that there are very good reasons to not have these in my car, or anyone’s really, in a way where they cannot be removed!
Obviously with your key that can already open the doors remotely
I don’t know what “the first bunch” is so I can’t answer that but these are all definitely use while away from the car.
sorry, I wanted to mean these:
My car reminds me if the doors are unlocked or left open. I can adjust the charging speed at any time. I can turn on the HVAC and seat heaters before I leave. I can see my current state of charge. I can see exactly what is happening when my alarm goes off
_
Is that a real question? You’re going to figure out why your alarm is going off, and if it’s stolen you’re going to give it to the police so they can recover it…
yes, why do you need a moving, online accessible high quality surveillance camera system is a real question.
I don’t think you need this to report it to the police, the loud alarm and policeman on the road searching for the stolen car has worked well for decades. or at least I haven’t heard of car theft in… a pretty long time, so long that I don’t even remember.
I dunno what an “extension” is but pretty sure it doesn’t exist or can’t do these things.
oh it would exist if laws would force car makers to not place unremovable tracking systems in the car by default.
but I that being said, think these tings do exist, in the form of little devices thay you can connect to your car’s OBD port, and they have a GPS receiver and a SIM slot to do it’s job.
doubtful if that thermometer worked well.
40+ °C is dangerous and can be lethal, but of course not immediately, instead as your body heats up
it was a fucking example, man. but there are places where if you left the car in the direct sun on the summer, a few hours later it will have 40-45 °C or so in there.
as does the compiler and the rust book