No bud I get the tone you’re bringing to the conversation and the lack of empathy for the situation.
No bud I get the tone you’re bringing to the conversation and the lack of empathy for the situation.
You didn’t touch a nerve you took a very complicated situation and boiled it down to this man must not be budgeting properly. The real issue at play was the last thing you mentioned. You addressed it but it was one sentence. I’m not saying budgeting isn’t important I’m saying you’re not focusing on the issue. Sorry I was a dick but you’re missing the point entirely.
I’m sure that’ll happen. Keep on preaching the good word of if you’re houseless it’s your own fault. Thanks bud!
I mean I get it these people should be charged but seriously Chase? Aren’t you supposed to be like a bank that’s all about security? So we’re pissing away a bunch of gov’t resources to track down and charge these criminals cause Chase can’t roll out a remote deposit system that works properly? Seems like the gov’t should investigate how tf this happened in the first place
You got the facts straight and came to the logical conclusion but is it necessary to armchair quarterback his hypothetical financial situation?
I think you’re half correct. It’s going to be Buttigieg. Not your average mayo and white bread guy but a mayo and white bread guy. It would make for a strong ticket with a lot of appeal. With the bonus of not having a contestable senate seat or governorship because he’s currently a US secretary.
You’ll get it eventually.