Further confirmation that Switch 2’s hardware will be hot garbage as well.

Isn’t this just the pay raise the Japanese company is forcing everyone to do? They’re pretty late. A bunch of other companies announced their raises earlier this year. Doing this in October comes off as scummy.

Someone dumb enough could easily flatten someone backing up with that bug.

The animation stuff you mentioned exists today:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt1yNJ180Cs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AnovXOJOaw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAMSfmHuMOQ

Is this an attempt to beat those monopoly allegations?

They tried to make video game rentals illegal in the US. They’ve always been a shitty, anti-consumer company.

You can never learn anything with these clickbait headlines.

Or just not show people what you’re typing.

That whole page is full of wild shit.

I can’t tell if this is a joke or not.

A computer like that is useful outside of work. I’d pay for it out of pocket if I had to.

The only thing I got from this is that bro loves ads more than anything in the world.

I accept regulations are real, but not all ways to help people require you dealing with regulations. I’m still waiting on that proof by the way.

There are more ways to help people than making medical software. Rather than saying they could focus on doing simpler things, you automatically jumping to all projects running afoul of FDA regulations is pretty telling. All while still having not provided a single project halted by FDA order.

Which projects have been shut down by FDA order?

Open source AI is huge, and I don’t think you need FDA approval to distribute a model. Where are you even getting that from?

What about open source projects?

This isn’t about research into AI, what some people want will impact all research, criticism, analysis, archiving. Please re-read the letter.

You should read this letter by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries.

Why are scholars and librarians so invested in protecting the precedent that training AI LLMs on copyright-protected works is a transformative fair use? Rachael G. Samberg, Timothy Vollmer, and Samantha Teremi (of UC Berkeley Library) recently wrote that maintaining the continued treatment of training AI models as fair use is “essential to protecting research,” including non-generative, nonprofit educational research methodologies like text and data mining (TDM). If fair use rights were overridden and licenses restricted researchers to training AI on public domain works, scholars would be limited in the scope of inquiries that can be made using AI tools. Works in the public domain are not representative of the full scope of culture, and training AI on public domain works would omit studies of contemporary history, culture, and society from the scholarly record, as Authors Alliance and LCA described in a recent petition to the US Copyright Office. Hampering researchers’ ability to interrogate modern in-copyright materials through a licensing regime would mean that research is less relevant and useful to the concerns of the day.

That title looks like a typical sports anime title.

• Haikyu!!
• Kuroko’s Basketball
• Blue Lock
• Hajime no Ippo
• Ace of Diamond
• Slam Dunk
• Major
• The Prince of Tennis
• Yowamushi Pedal
• One Outs
• Baby Steps

I could go on, but I think I’ve made my point.