No, because I’m selfish. I plan to retire early so I live frugally and invest all my savings.
Independent thinker valuing discussions grounded in reason, not emotions.
Open to reconsider my views in light of good-faith counter-arguments but also willing to defend what’s right, even when it’s unpopular. My goal is to engage in dialogue that seeks truth rather than scoring points.
No, because I’m selfish. I plan to retire early so I live frugally and invest all my savings.
The 17 red lines before were just bluffs but this time they really mean it
Also the fact that there’s always going to be falsely convicted people getting murdered. I can’t think of a greater injustice than sentencing someone to death for a crime they didn’t commit. I’ll rather have multiple murderers walk free than sentence an innocent man to death.
You should probably go try it out yourself and discover that it’s not actually being blocked and it never has.
Says the guy insulting a stranger solely based on their profession
I remember that feeling. It goes by with experience. I love driving and I’d never buy an automatic as long as there’s a manual alternative.
There are infinite list of things and services that are way too expensive for me to even consider buying but I also don’t go around complaining about them. Move on guys… If you want free wallpapers you can try one of the other 9000 free wallpaper apps available. This is recreational outrage.
If I can still get pleasure from the stimulation itself but just be unable to reach climax then I’d choose to live without orgasms.
Male sedation hypothesis might have a part in it as well.
The “Male Sedation Hypothesis” proposes that digital stimuli like video games, pornography, and social media are sedating young men, reducing their tendencies for status-seeking and reproductive behaviors, which historically might have led to instability in societies. theorizes that these digital interactions provide men with titrated doses of what would traditionally drive their social and reproductive pursuits. For example, men receive reproductive cues from pornography and camaraderie or status in video games, leading to reduced real-world interaction and aggression. This is potentially creating a less volatile but more socially detached male population. Williamson perceives this as a mixed blessing; while it prevents disruptive behaviors, it may render these young men less effective in real-world situations that demand assertiveness or direct action
So the gist of it is basically that in prior times like this, the discredited young men have taken it to the streets, assembling in groups of other similar men and start causing trouble by breaking windows and kicking grannies. However, we’re not seeing this now despite the record numbers of such men and one hypothesis for why this is, is that those men are instead withdrawing from the society into their mom’s basements and spending their time playing games, watching porn and smoking weed.
It is AI though. AGI, which is a subcategory of AI and what many people seemingly imagine AI to mean, it’s not—but AI, yes.
Source on the quote?
You can google battery drop test and find infinite articles about it. I did not infact learn this today. It’s a trick I’ve been using for years.
Dont stare into the lights of oncoming traffic. I know it’s bright and all but just dont stare directly at them at that’ll solve 90% of the problem.
I completely agree. It’s not an echo chamber I’m trying to build here. I never block anyone only for having a different opinion. Quite the contrary; I actively look for a debate. I just don’t want to engage with people who do it in bad faith.
Oh absolutely. A huge number of the people I’ve blocked are probably perfectly decent people and I just happened to notice them write that one snide response.
However, I’ve quite often seen blocked people commenting to me and I’ve logged out to read the comment and I’d say about 50% of the time it has been a mean comment only proving that I blocked them for a good reason. I also sometimes go thru the modlog and a huge number of the the users I see there I have already blocked.
I agree with your point though. You’re right, I just don’t care. There’s so many people here that when I block someone there’s another to take their place. There’s just too much to pay attention to.
I agree. I could block 90% of the people online and there would still be an endless feed of new content to pay attention to. I don’t miss anything by blocking users that I wouldn’t be missing either way.
C’moon now. Linking a 40 minute video is not an explanation.
Care to elaborate?
I’m open to talk with anyone. It’s only after they demonstrate their uncivility that I block them.
What does this even mean?