Has anyone told them they can probably use AI to search for opportunities for lawsuits?
Has anyone told them they can probably use AI to search for opportunities for lawsuits?
Oh wow, so it’s basically a content farm for /r/TheRightCantMeme
Government employee makes mistake, other employee corrects mistake, innocent family suffers minor inconvenience. Stay tuned for more.
You should watch Johnny Got His Gun if you haven’t. Not quite as extreme but kind of similar theme.
This fucking guy. I hope he gets soundly defeated in November and I never have to hear or read about some dumb shit he said ever again.
Not meaningless, just flawed
No wait nevermind they were just between the couch cushions here. Haha that’s so funny I don’t know why I would assu- … wait… WHY IS THIS ON THE NEWS
I hope they finally launch it officially, it’s been such a long time. I’m mostly hopeful that if they do launch the Steam Deck then they might also launch future hardware as well without such a big delay.
I’m sorry sir, we stopped serving breakfast at 11 30
Maybe there’s a good argument for nonviolence but “the means dictate the ends” isn’t it imo. It could be that there’s more to it in the book but presented as is I’d say it doesn’t follow logically, I’m going to want to see proof that it’s actually true which is going to be tricky because there are obvious counter examples.
The easiest one is probably Ukraine. I’m sure most Ukrainians want to live in a peaceful and nonviolent society, but if they took your principle to heart there would be no Ukraine right now.
They are often found residing on or near couches though
Not only that but I thought comedy was explicitly ok as well! It’s so confusing, you have to ban so many accounts before you get free speech apparently.
You’re right and I really wish you weren’t.
Yeah, I agree she is at fault for spreading harmful and fucking racist misinformation online. At the same time though it must be wild to have a president candidate pick it up and run with it. It’s a shame it took this kind of experience to make her see the potential harm of her actions.
What qualifies someone to be a judge is simply redefined to be what is popular. A judge should therefore no longer follow the law, but make the ruling most in line with what is popular. Under a voting system that is the sole qualifier.
Yes I agree, and just because there is a methodology doesn’t make the result not arbitrary. Can you explain what number four means? How do I assess it, what’s a 0, what’s a 5 and what’s a 10? How does number 2 relate to bias, isn’t that a factuality rating thing , why is it in the bias rubric? It’s a joke, each rating is totally arbitrary as there is no definition of what each one means beyond some vague description of the category. It’s essentially pick a number, feels based.
I have worked with qualitive rubrics before and this one is barely worthy of the name honestly. Two people could take this rubric away and come to completely opposite conclusions based on their own biases.
He wants a perfect body. He wants a perfect soul.
That’s pretty metal
It does leave your flesh pockets awfully exposed