• Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s almost like they had to make compromises because their options were limited by materials, time, and access to the site.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s almost like Biden should have forced israel to let in aid through the land crossing like the ICJ ruling required israel to do.

    • AEsheron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Exactly, it was (very relatively) cheap and quick. And they figured when, not if, it breaks, it will be again quick to repair. And it is interesting tech that could be useful down the line that they may figure is worth the cost in training alone.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Modular military engineering materials are both obscenely expensive, and temporary. They are meant as a bandaid to quickly solve transportation problems to enable logistics.

          Also, being modular, they can be replaced easily and quickly.

          If you want a hardy lifetime dock, you’re going to need months to years under ideal circumstances. And then Isreal could “accidentally” blow it up with a “rogue” strike, and there would be no option but to scrap the whole thing. Because most permanent docks aren’t meant to handle military strikes.

          But yeah, let’s just ignore that the building constraints around this are just about the worst case imaginable. Let’s just keep whining about how a solution isn’t perfect and therefore worthless like all the other Leftist comments on Lemmy

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            They barely delivered any aid. This was a boondoggle.

            It’s amazing the military ineptness people excuse.

            • catloaf@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not ineptitude. Their hands are tied by the government from providing aid in any effective way.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’d say the U.S. not offering Israel any more support until they open the borders to aid would go a long way to solving things.

                But apparently that’s going way beyond the pale.

                • Wrench@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And how exactly will that put food in the hands of the starving Palestinians?

                  Again with the “if it’s not perfect, it’s not worth doing” bullshit I’m so tired of hearing about this conflict.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Sorry… how will letting aid trucks into Gaza put food in the hands of starving Palestinians?

                    You know what aid trucks are, right?

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We don’t want a hardy lifetime dock. We want Israel to stop committing genocide and to allow aid by land and air routes.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ok. And how has that negotiation been going?

              I prefer to actually do what can be done in the short term, while we continue to work on long term solutions in tandem. Not just put all your eggs in the long term basket, and let the Palestinians starve if it takes too long, or doesn’t happen at all.

          • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            And then Isreal could “accidentally” blow it up with a “rogue” strike

            Yeah maybe they should stop giving rockets to the rogue state that keeps blowing up their shit.

            Let’s just keep whining about how a solution isn’t perfect

            The only thing this is a solution for is to the problem of “what’s a good way to pretend we’re humanitarians while genociding the people we’re pretending we care about”, so yeah, it’s worthless if you don’t want that to happen.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              The tendency to make Perfect the enemy of Good.

              It’s a tired theme here on Lemmy, particularly WRT Gaza, and particularly in criticism of Biden’s policy towards Isreal.