You can’t cut any taxes or programs to fund your idea. Nothing else in your government is going to change. It can’t be a tax that you avoid somehow. The money comes from you and similar people in your situation. Don’t try to get around it in some way.

What would you pay more taxes to support?

    • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This. Absolute game changer. If my job gave me the money they spend on my behalf for the crappy health insurance they provide, it would likely result in an actual increase in my net pay after the increased taxes to pay for the program. Cut out hundreds of thousands of parasitic middlemen, like insurers and pharmacy benefit managers. Throw out the crazy quilt of non-doctors who decide what medications and procedures are are covered. Reduce billing staff because of the major paperwork reduction (don’t need to deal with hundreds of different insurance plans). And do away with coding - the letters and numbers on a bill that can drastically change a procedure’s cost to the patient.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Jury duty stipends indexed to cost of living.

    Today, in my county, you get $20 a day. That won’t even cover parking near the courthouse.

    Serving on a jury shouldn’t prevent you from being able to make rent for the month.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Let’s do one that wouldn’t end up saving the taxpayer in the long run.

    Universal access to legal council.

    Too many matters are not brought to the court which probably should be because of costs to the litigants, and far too many times are costs to the litigants used as a weapon to keep people from exercizing their rights under threat of getting buried.

    It’s the worst kept secret that whoever has more money is gonna win the case 9/10 times and making lawyers salaried public servants as opposed to hired mercenary litigants, and providing access to legal services and council for free at point of service, would go a long way towards balancing the litigious inequality that is often experienced in the US.

    So yeah, I’d pay more in taxes for the little guy to have the deck not be so blatantly stacked against them in the judicial system.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Increased support for Ukraine.

    It’s at the moment more important than solving any domestic issues.

    (I most likely don’t live in your country, only argue for your favored domestic issues if you really have nothing better to do).