US president’s remarks to Time magazine about PM’s role in conflict draw heavily critical response from Israeli government

Joe Biden has said that there is “every reason” to draw the conclusion that Benjamin Netanyahu is prolonging the war in Gaza for his own political self-preservation.

Biden made the remarks about the Israeli prime minister in an interview with Time magazine published on Tuesday morning, drawing a sharp response from the Israeli government, which accused the US president of straying from diplomatic norms.

Netanyahu’s popularity plummeted after the 7 October attack by Hamas, which exposed serious flaws in Israeli security. Most political observers say Netanyahu would lose elections if they were held now, and would be forced into opposition, facing court hearings on corruption charges. But elections have been put off until the war is over, or at least until major military operations are deemed to have been completed.

Time asked Biden whether he believed Netanyahu was “prolonging the war for his own political self-preservation”.

“I’m not going to comment on that,” the president said in response, but added: “There is every reason for people to draw that conclusion.”

  • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    Consider my comment moot to your point.

    I see what you meant now and these are all facts that i agree overall.

    There are also European elections coming up. Together with the presidential election, the results will influence the 2 wars we have going on.

    But I’m afraid, the only choices are:

    • Everything continues like it is now

    • Everything will get much worse

    & I feel like we are straying far away from:

    • Make things better, for everyone
    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yep.

      And the worst part about is “make things better, for everyone” not being picked, is that would make it a lot easier to avoid “everything will get much worse”.

      Say what you want about Bill and Obama’s actions while in office, but they were charismatic as hell and ran progressive campaigns. Campaigns that easily got them into and kept them in the White House.

      Yet for some reason when Trump showed up, we have to start running candidates like Hillary and Biden?

      There’s no rational reason behind it, if the only thing that matters is beating trump, we should give the voters what they want.

      We need to run candidates who are similar to Bill and Obama, not people that just used to stand next to them a lot like their wife or VP. Charisma doesn’t just rub off on people like that.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        So your solution is to just find someone that’s charismatic as hell? That’s what you’re putting up as the best option for president of the United States?

        Genocide? Genny who? This guy’s charismatic as hell, I didn’t care what he does!

        You’re handlers really need to feed you a more coherent narrative.