OpenAl is sticking to its story that it never intended to copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice when seeking an actor for ChatGPT’s “Sky” voice mode.

This all “feels personal," the voice actress said, "being that it’s just my natural voice and I’ve never been compared to her by the people who do know me closely.”

This comes at a time when many studios are otherwise intrigued by the idea of using AI for things like digital effects but remain, after a long history of avoiding copyright conflicts, hesitant to connect with any company potentially viewed as stealing artists’ work without consent, Reuters reported.

    • joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      What doing satire has to do with the matter?

      How do you think it would go if OpenAI had used actors with the voices of Biden or Trump and Altman had tweeted “POTUS” just before the event?

      Altman knew exactly what he was doing.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Parody is legal. This is not parody.

      To be fair, I have not looked into this case enough to have an opinion. Just wanted to point out the logic error.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        So like, can you a record label sue another band for ‘sounding like’ the band that they are promoting?

        It was more of a thing in the 90s, but there were always competing follow up bands (Sublime being followed by 311) that chased the sound of another artist.

        Like should NSync be sued for being a boy band following in Backstreet Boys wake?

        Not parody, but mimicry is fundamental to art.

        I suppose my rather extreme views on copyright and up leaves me the outlier here, but I think the whole thing is rather absurdist.