Reminder to switch browsers if you haven’t already!


  • Google Chrome is starting to phase out older, more capable ad blocking extensions in favor of the more limited Manifest V3 system.
  • The Manifest V3 system has been criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for restricting the capabilities of web extensions.
  • Google has made concessions to Manifest V3, but limitations on content filtering remain a source of skepticism and concern.
  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sorry. I’ve seen this so many times today and I can’t stand it anymore.

    I hate this article photo. What the fuck is that shit?? Gloveless fingers? Digit warmer? Turtlefinger sweater?

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      How long until the majority of the Internet is inaccessible to non-Chromium browsers because the pages “don’t support them”?

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Honestly the way the internet is going do you need access to the majority of the internet? I feel like its pretty dead as it is now already.

        Lemmy will still work because we mostly use Firefox, and i bet the same will hold true for many others.

        Basically the moment mainstream internet becomes google only you will see nerds build new websites specifiably to cater to the non google crowd and i trust random internet nerds a hack of a lot more than a monopoly corporation.

        BRING IT ON GOOGLE!, YOU CAN INITIATE THE PUSH TO CREATE A NEW BETTER INTERNET. ^Create demand for freedom trough your suppressive enforments^

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh yeah nothing bad could ever happen from effectively removing an entire section of the population from certain parts of the Internet completely.

          I can’t imagine that ever going badly.

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s already the case. Facebook etc have been walled gardens (or prisons if you prefer) for decade and a half now.

      • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If it don’t work on Firefox I won’t use it. There are better FOSS options anyways

        • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure as long as it’s not my bank or my employer or the gov official website for accessing my taxes…

            • Kiernian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              “WebUSB is a JavaScript application programming interface specification for securely providing access to USB devices from web applications”

              Holy Hannah, NO!!!

              Might as well allow a website to direct write to your hard drive unprompted again.

              Does noone see how BAD this stuff is?

              Stop creating attack vectors with glowing neon signs on them.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I would close my bank account and such to a different bank. It takes literally 5 minutes to open one online.

            And yes, I would not work for a company that doesn’t support Firefox

            I would also keep pestering support of the government website, that one I will have to give to you

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t think that’s going to be the case. People will find workarounds. The whole point of these alternative browsers is to use the web in whatever way the developers think their user base wants to use it. If the web is inaccessible to non-chromium browsers then people will spoof their browser to the site to look like a chromium browser.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            If we get to the point where the corporatocracy can force us into a limited set of compliant browsers then the web as we know it has ended. I don’t think they’ll go that far unless they decide to go whole hog. That level of control will likely look to wipe out any useful plugins like ad-blockers or other privacy features. I didn’t want to go down the slippery slope argument, but that’s pretty much what will happen if they go that direction.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            But most of those only give you a few bits of data. Like if there’s only one technique that succeeded, you might have the same fingerprint as everyone with your exact phone with the rest randomized

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is getting more common. Whatever dev accepted that when sizing the story should hang their head in shame. “No, you don’t size for a poor solution, you size for a good solution and let the PMs chip at the things they understand, keeping some things sacrosanct”.

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 months ago

    I use Firefox everywhere which means I have ads blocking everywhere, including and especially on Android. All my tabs are synced and are easily transferred between devices.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      While I dont use Firefox itself any more I am using librewolf on my PC, which sadly doesnt exist for phones yet. Also, GOS comes with its own privacy oriented chromium fork called vanadium, so I’m using that in the mean time.

      • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I also use librewolf and have settled for iceraven on my phone. the list of installable extensions is much longer (even if not everything is working yet, depending on how far mozilla has come along) and it has about:config support, which gives me a pretty close approximation of my desktop browser.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’ve found the Mull browser (which can be found through the DivestOS repository on F-Droid) works great as a privacy-focused firefox fork, similar to LibreWolf. I hear Fennic F-Droid is also a pretty good but less extreme alternative, but I’d imagine you don’t care much about that if you use LibreWolf.

    • huquad@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Firefox is a good option.

    But I will raise people one more. Waterfox. Been using it for over a year now and enjoy it.

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well I will sound like an old bore but throughout the nearly 20 years Firefox is out I never looked at anything else. Seen the rise and fall of Internet Explorer seeing the rise and fall of chrome.

    Even Firefox in its dreadfully slow era (2010-2016) it did not made me change. And let me be clear Firefox is far from perfect. But for my use cases (privacy and security balance over certain conveniences) I would not change for any commercially backed Browser.

    Moral of the story. It’s better to donate to Mozilla and enjoy the freedom of your browser than giving yourself in on the erratic behavior of the big tech companies.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fortunately I at least have Firefox on Linux. But then when I need to use Windows for something… well look at that, also Firefox!

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s weird that I’ve been on firefox for the vast majority of my life and I always had this perception that “everyone” was using it. Here in lemmy you hear about it all the time, my friends use it, I see it on my newsfeeds etc

    But when you check the market share it around 2.8% while chrome is 65.1% https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was at my parents house last week because i had to help them with their laptop. I told my mom about firefox and she was very confused because she doesn’t seem to understand that google chrome is a browser and that every browser can access google search or their banking site.

      It took a bit of effort to explain that firefox works the exact same but is safer and faster.

      She is now using firefox on her phone because i showed her ublock origin works with it to block ads.

      A lot of people don’t seem to understand that google chrome isn’t the internet and what exactly a browser is.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel like “most people” only learn “one technology per category”. They know of, one operative system, one browser, one app to mindless scroll, one program to edit text. As a developer it shocks me a little because I’m always eager to try new programming languages, technologies and ways to interact with things. I guess most people only know about edge/safari because they come pre-installed

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          How is that shocking?

          I use Linux, Firefox, Lemmy, nano. Why would I change?

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        A lot of people don’t seem to understand that google chrome isn’t the internet and what exactly a browser is.

        It’s been that way for a lot longer than chrome has been the big one, it used to be the same with internet explorer…

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would even go as far as saying that the left meniscus of the gaussian thinks google chrome is “google” and the “thing that finds webs”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Might have to do with the fact that Firefox was the dominant browser for quite awhile until Chrome arrived on the scene.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      I remember a point around 2015ish where a lot of web apps went from recommending Firefox and Chrome for the best experience to just Chrome. Now I often see “don’t use Firefox” as a support tactic.

    • Kiernian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is also why there’s such a a prevalence of flashing warning banners, fake pseudobluescreens, and other scary shit disguised in chrome notifications.

      The notifications in chrome are as close to on by default as you can get and with the right code snippets you can make it look like the FBI locked down your workstation and you need to call them.

      Firefox should start hardening against this behavior now because popularity gets targeted even more specifically.

      Make it an end user safety feature.

      Force every notification to have

      “This is a notification from a website that you elected to receive by allowing notifications. You can disable these notifications here”

      with a link to the setting on the frame of of every one, no fullscreen allowed, no flashing, double-check and prohibit the words FBI, CIA, NSA, TSA, IRS, Social Security, Microsoft, etc.

    • Juigi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I guess average user cares mostly about how fast and smooth the browsing is. Chrome definitely has the edge on that over firefox.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m forced to use Chrome quite a bit (workplace silliness) and exclusively use Firefox at home. I seriously cannot see this edge that you claim Chrome has. Do you mean in loading speed? Scrolling speed?

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Switched to Firefox at work today. Looks like I still need Chrome to do the VPN handshake, but the more of us there are, the more pressure we have on IT!

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t have official information, but I doubt it. They tend to stick as closely to the Chromium experience as possible, with the exception of the ungoogled part, of course. Maintaining Manifest V2 support would also just be a massive amount of work, for which they likely don’t have the manpower.

        • AnActOfCreation@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I have no idea. I’d guess not, as it’s not a strong fork like other Chromium-based browsers. Its main selling point is that it’s nearly identical to Chrome, but with a lot of the Google garbage stripped out. I don’t use it as a daily driver, but only when I need something Chromium-based like the use case mentioned by @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml. It’s very likely to work wherever Chrome does.

    • Emptiness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m still confounded by workplaces that run the old nineties way of VPN handshake by browser. Clunky, clumsy just straight up bad digital workplace setup.

      There is no reason to not do it the modern way where all the handshaking and connecting is done under the hood, hidden from the user. At the most you as a user should only see the tiny little systray icon switch how it looks.