Remember to take shitposts seriously, it’s what the cool kids are doing

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    U r assuming that anarchists would be peaceful n just roll over on their backs to show their tummies to Genghis Khan.

    The goal of anarchism is freedom. The existence of a State means no freedom. Thus, anarchist militias unite to fight this threat. A stateless society doesn’t equate an unorganised society.

    • emmie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Good luck being efficient and quick without central command and centralised power. There’s a reason anarchism didn’t survive evolutionary process.

      Our economic systems and governing method are direct outcome of evolution. If they will be unfit for the contemporary reality they will die as all things do in nature that we are part of. Strongest and most resilient emerge. So far it’s been liberal democracy but there’s nothing that says this is a permanent victor

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Who said there would be no centralised command? It would just be opt out. If an individual/community wanted to opt out of this, there would be noone forcing them to not do so.

        As for evolution of political systems due to natural selection, would you say the same about democracy? Stable democracy that we know about today has existed only for the past 300 years. Women got the right to vote this century. If u r living under a dictatorship, would you use the same argument of natural selection to not fight for a democracy?