• tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As the article points out, it’s more that because there is regulation that permits blocking development on environmental or historical grounds, it often gets used to block developments that people don’t like for entirely-different reasons.

      I’m generally not very sympathetic to regulation aimed at blocking development, feel that we err way on the “don’t build” side.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YIMBY

      The YIMBY movement (short for “yes in my back yard”) is a pro-housing movement[1] that focuses on encouraging new housing, opposing density limits (such as single-family zoning), and supporting public transportation. It stands in opposition to NIMBY (“not in my back yard”) tendencies, which generally oppose most forms of urban development in order to maintain the status quo.[2][3][4]

      As a popular organized movement in the United States, the YIMBY movement began in the San Francisco Bay Area in the 2010s amid a housing affordability crisis and has subsequently become a potent political force in state and local politics across the United States.[5][6]

      The YIMBY position supports increasing the supply of housing within cities where housing costs have escalated to unaffordable levels.[7] They have also supported infrastructure development projects like improving housing development[8] (especially for affordable housing[9] or trailer parks[10]), high-speed rail lines,[11][4] homeless shelters,[12] day cares,[13] schools, universities and colleges,[14][15] bike lanes, and pedestrian safety infrastructure.[3] YIMBYs often seek rezoning that would allow denser housing to be produced or the repurposing of obsolete buildings, such as shopping malls, into housing.[16][17][18] Cities that have adopted YIMBY policies have seen substantial increase in housing supply and reductions in rent.[19]

      I think that at a certain point, there’s a backlash against mechanisms used to block new construction. Housing in California is a good example.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Historic enough that a lot of people are advocating preserving them as a part of America’s “greatness”. 🙄 😮‍💨

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We’ve gone from ‘Wait, the cars are not the dominant life form of the planet, they’re constructed devices of the dominant lifeform of the planet that destroys the environment to facilitate their daily movement between different boxes?’

    To ‘No actually the cars are actually the dominant lifeform, they have more rights and priority than 99% of their operators.’

    Hope the dolphins take over soon.

    EDIT: Has anyone made some kind of online map for the whole US that compares minimum wage to hourly parking rates?