I just noticed that one of the news communities here discourage the use of least biased/centrist news sources and I saw some people who put that they hate centrists in their bios.

All is that is kind of weird to me and does not make sense, as I thought that all sides should encourage ideas from centrists and least biased sources.

Is there is something that I miss here?

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Hey pickle, I get the feeling that the conversation happening here is about a specific scenario that you aren’t personally involved in. No need to take offense.

        • fart_pickle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m not taking an offense. I see that the discussion is going towards US political landscape but I think the issue is more global. We as the people are slowly losing the ability to compromise and fall into 1-or-0 narration.

      • arality@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t agree. As I said in other comment I consider myself as a centrist. And my view on the world is a reasonable one (in my opinion). I’m pro same sex marriage, abortion, women rights, same salary for the same work for both genders, public health care and education. But I’m also against unchecked illegal immigration, pretending to be woman so you can win in sports and social handouts. Why does it make me a target for right wingers and not left wingers?

        Yep, conservative pretending to be centrist. See the left actually has empathy for people, which you clearly lack.

      • Applesauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        So on the right, you have people who don’t want an entire subset of the population to exist. On the left, you have those people who are fighting for the right to exist. Tell me where a centrist falls in this situation. How can you meet in the middle?

        • AmidFuror@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          You could be fine with the people existing but differ in how to correct past or systemic injustices.

          Or let’s say you think the prices of some things should be set by supply and demand, but you’re against gouging in emergencies and think some basic necessities (food, water, medicine) should have price controls.

          There’s plenty of middle ground, and the people who say you’re with us or you’re for the Nazis may have forgotten what the Soviet victory meant for Eastern Europe.

          • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Great, but as to the point about wanting huge swaths of the population to cease to exist? You know, the actual question the OP asked.

            • AmidFuror@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 months ago

              Who is the OP here? Because I can’t see from the post itself or this comment thread who is arguing that.

              • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                3 months ago

                So on the right, you have people who don’t want an entire subset of the population to exist. On the left, you have those people who are fighting for the right to exist. Tell me where a centrist falls in this situation. How can you meet in the middle?

                • AmidFuror@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Here’s what I wrote in response:

                  You could be fine with the people existing but differ in how to correct past or systemic injustices.

                  Someone might be viewed as centrist if they were in favor of civil rights but have some reservations about affirmative action.

                  If your argument is simply that anyone who thinks gays have the right to exist is left and not a centrist, I think your definition is not aligning. People say Democrats in the US are center-right. Many Democrats support gay rights. So therefore they are left?

                  • Applesauce@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Do you understand the viewpoint that if you are against affirmative action, you are appeasing the right? Actions speak louder than words, and while affirmative action wasn’t perfect when rolled out, it was better than lip service while doing nothing.

                    Let’s take your statement for example: Someone wants to have equal and fair treatment. The left side makes an argument for how to make things more fair. The right side says no, you don’t deserve those rights. The centrist then says, I think you should have rights, but not right now, or not this way. When the centrists appease the right, they are seen as the right.

          • Forester@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Get out of here with nuance and reason only blind hate allowed. /S

            Libertarian Minarchist

        • AmidFuror@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Here’s a delusion: Maduro is right to suppress free speech and association because he needs to keep the right from retaking power in Venezuela.

          • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t think this is at all something leftists in general think and I see a lot of them calling out what’s going on in Venezuela right now as large human rights violations. This is pretty much only something I see said by tankies (which is a small fraction of leftists).

            • FireTower@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Very good point. People online like to read one comment from someone and put them in a group then prescribe the values of that individual to the entire group.

              • AmidFuror@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 months ago

                Like they read a disingenuous comment from a far-right person claiming to be a centrist, and then they hate on all centrists? I could see that.

            • AmidFuror@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              So any left-wing delusion I post can be dismissed as “not all leftists?”