TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even without the custom ROMs, the whole Android ecosystem is a colossal fucking mess.

    I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more. It’s not even compatible with itself.

    People give Windows a load of shit, and deservedly so for some of it, but it’s a million times more usable than Android when you want shit to “just work”.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same with iOS, I don’t know why you are singling out Android here. My favorite game back when I used an iPad stopped working after certain update. It was a puzzle with rails and colored trains, can’t remember the name now.

      Windows and Linux are quite a lot better in this regard.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not singling them out, it just happens to be a thread about Android.

        There’s no reason for mobile OS’s to be flaky like this. There’s nothing magic about either that means old stuff can’t be supported. It’s just that trillion dollar corporations apparently can’t afford the resources.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          There kind of is, software changes and things need to be updated by comparison, your windows example is a double edged sword, there’s a lot of bloat and Microsoft can’t make changes that might be beneficial on windows because of all the backwards compatability layers and services they generally leave in. It’s good and bad in it’s own way.

      • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I suppose you’re talking about a 32-bit app that wasn’t updated for the newer 64-bit architecture. If yes, then there’s actually a technical reason behind it, not just Apple being dicks. Because other than 32-bit apps, every app that received a 64-bit update should still work on the latest iOS.

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more.

      That’s true for every operating system. Old apps aren’t updated to use new system APIs and such and they eventually stop working.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        On desktops we can use virtual environments, translation layers, plenty of solutions to make old programs and games work on a modern OS. Phones are somehow incapable of this.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yet I can compile applications that work on Windows XP, and they still work under Windows 11.

        It’s not as if Android is some svelte slimline OS where every byte matters. There’s plenty of room there for keeping compatibility with older apps.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Dude there’s millions of lines of code and thousands of hours per year that keep old windows shit running. It’s a nightmare to support that. Microsoft has made that a priority and you can easily argue it shouldn’t be, but you seem convinced that’s the only valid path. It’s not.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      How we all wish there was a third option, I would genuinely take less functionality in favour of privacy and performance. I don’t need AI and fancy image processing. I want to use my phone to pay the old way, like when samsung copied the magnetic strip info, not like now where google gets a copy of my receipts.

      Sucks iOS is the alternative, nearly gave in last week but the price was just too much for what I was getting.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Software that is 10 years old and unmaintained is likely unsafe to use and therefore shouldn’t work. Windows has a lot of issues specifically because it’s backward compatible with ancient software, actually. Security and a path forward should matter more than clinging to old software that must stop working someday regardless of how hard you try to delay it. Emulation/VMs are and should be a way to work around that on desktop and it would actually be nice if mobile OSes had that too. That way at least the ancient software can be sandboxed and not a security weakpoint. The right approach though is not to do this horrible patchwork of APIs like windows which creates a security nightmare

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more.

      I’m actually for this. The bar to entry for the Play Store is too low with too many low quality and unmaintained apps. I’m all for booting insecure and super old apps. They cheapen the ecosystem.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Well that’s all very well, but I’ve got a bathroom speaker I can no longer access.

        So how about instead of Daddy Google deciding what’s best for everyone, they let things run and give you a warning?

        Hell, I’ve even got games I’ve paid for that are now gone. Honestly, fuck them for even thinking that’s acceptable.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Same, it’s why I never buy a game or app nowadays, they will just stop working when the new OS version comes around, devs already got their money so they don’t have any incentive to care, and contrary to PC I can’t do shit about it myself on my phone, there’s no “androidbox” to run old apps inside my phone.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          So how about instead of Daddy Google deciding what’s best for everyone, they let things run and give you a warning?

          That is not what’s happening. It takes tons of work to maintain backward compatibility but you’re framing it as though it doesn’t and they’re just being a holes on purpose.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            So it’s my choice to run them?

            If I can download an APK, I should be able to run it in a “compatibility mode” and have the OS do it’s best to run it.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It can’t.

              A compatibility mode would involve meaningful cost, massively compromise security, and not have a chance in hell of working.

              • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                They could just spin up a container of some sort. It’s still fundamentally Linux, so it should be possible to run Android inside an lxc container the same way you can run a desktop Linux distro in docker (which is based on the lxc functionality in the Linux kernel)

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The point is that you have to emulate a fuckton of low level access to even have a chance of anything working. Either you replace the actual hardware access with junk data, making none of the apps work, or you break the whole permissions structure, and your security is completely gone.

                  All of those APIs were deprecated because it’s impossible to provide them in any way that resembles security.

                  • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I mean, as long as it’s in a pretty robust sandbox and it’s either firewalled or has no network access (if possible for the app in question), I would think security implications are minimal. Like, even if the version of Android inside the container is compromised, the app could only take over its own container, which is non-privileged and doesn’t have access to anything you didn’t explicitly give it (in terms of user data).

            • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              There’s a few apps that let you virtualize an older version of Android, but in my experience they’re slow, and they’re all from sketchy-looking Chinese companies that are for sure harvesting all your data. There’s also an open source project running for this, but I don’t remember what it was called and it was fairly limited.

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It doesn’t allow direct connection. You have to dick about with a stupid app to put it in “speaker mode” first.

            • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Gives me Sonos vibes.

              I won a Sonos speaker years ago, thing needed (from memory) an app to switch to AUX mode. The speaker sounded great but I didn’t want to install an app just to use the thing.

              In a grand spectacle my ex’s cat kicked a potplant off a windowsill into our fish tank. That shorted a power board, we didn’t have breakers (ceramic / wire fuses) which ended up killing the speaker.

              Honestly as nice of a speaker it was, good riddance.

            • Gingernate@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Damn that sucks!!! I wish there was a way to sandbox older apps. I’ve ran into the same issue with old apps before.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You’re really arguing for a covenant around tech that companies want to orphan. The rule needs to be the code is opened and a slacker code owner is appointed for handover.

          This is gonna embarrass Google a Lot but it’s gonna embarrass azn and m$ a whole lot more.

          The forced alternative is a refund if you can bring something recognizable with a serial number to your post office or something as ubiquitous, present and staffed - have them validate in the loosest fashion and require like 10 bizdays for the cash refund.

          Whether or not the post office is there for that or charges the OEM for the notary-light service is a matter for the courts, the USPS, and these days probably the fn SCotUS.

    • TunaCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more.

      People give Windows a load of shit… but it’s a million times more usable than Android

      Where do you run your old Windows Phone apps nowadays? What about new Windows Phone apps?