• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Your argument is, basically, that a man is better than a woman at sports, just because he’s a man.

    No. Women should always have the option to compete against men, (and prove they are better), if they chose to. But just look at world records if you need concrete proof that males have an advantage.

    Many sports there is no physical advantage and some (e.g. climbing) women have the advantage.

    On the scale youre talking about, the government would be complicit in widescale corruption to rig a single event in an event where there’s no money involved for the winner,

    Not a single event, this could be done for multiple events, even without the athlete’s knowledge. For the first decade only a few record keepers need to be in the conspiracy.

    All for what reward? A single relatively worthless gold medal?

    Why? You should ask cold war Russia.