It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Internet shutoffs shouldn’t be a thing, outside of non-payment or legitimate abuse. If I do something illegal, they should have to sue me, not shut off my internet.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, they don’t disconnect a criminals phone service because they committed a crime and made a phone call. It makes no damned sense.

      • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Only happens as a matter by court order and is a limit on the person not on the corporations. Though if found out after by the court it can be ordered terminated. And you will face further punishment. But this is levied against the person. As in “You are not allowed to do a thing and if we find out you did the thing you will face further punishments.” Corporations should not have the responsibility or ability to determine any ones eligibility. They are a businesses not a government.They are responsible for their own tos and should never be anything more.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually, that’s been done several times over the decades. As well as banning computer access. The guy caught hacking into the fbi gets his mouse and keyboard taken away.

    • elephantium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you do something illegal, you should be arrested.

      Copyright infringement lawsuits are a far cry from bomb threats or the like.

        • elephantium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          So you’re saying copyright infringement is on par with speeding or parking past the meter’s end? Eh, fair enough.

          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            Honestly it is less severe than speeding. Copyright was an invention of the pre-digital era. Now that we all use computers, so many things we do every day are technically copyright infringement that it is absurd to even have these kinds of conversations.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was just pointing out a logical fallacy. It’s literally impossible to do the thing you said.

            This is just facts, they aren’t an opinion

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve been ticketed for speeding, and that certainly doesn’t come with the threat of arrest unless I’m driving super recklessly or something (but that’s a different offense altogether).

    • oconnordaniel@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe not a court order. But I could get behind a process similar to other utilities where you have months or warning and paperwork.