• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You can’t have e2e encrypted anything without identifying information about unique users. Nothing reasonably secure anyway.

    • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      SimpleX does it but is missing push-to-talk, no email, no phone number, no username or password, no sign up needed.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You can’t have e2e encrypted anything without identifying information about unique users.

        SimpleX does it

        No, it doesn’t. It has IDs for unique users, but tries to mitigate the risks by keeping a separate set of IDs to use with each contact. (This is like having a separate Matrix/Jabber/Signal/whatever account for each contact.)

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I feel like this violates the Unix philosophy. I think a dedicated program that handles unmuting the mic would be a better solution that solves this issue more generally.