The Trump campaign on Tuesday filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission arguing money raised for President Joe Biden’s reelection bid cannot be transferred to Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign.

The complaint was filed by the Trump campaign’s general counsel David Warrington and argues transferring the funds would amount to “little more than a thinly veiled $91.5 million excessive contribution from one presidential candidate to another.”

“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended,” the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, states.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    A gridlocked decision means nothing happens. That’s why nothing happens for all the legitimate stuff before the FEC.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The FEC chair could spin it and say that because a decision has not been made of is allowed or not, access to the money will be frozen

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Based on what? The chair isn’t a tiebreaking vote, they don’t just get to make policy choices on an even split. The FEC needs 4 votes to act. There’s no spin involved, if they don’t have 4 votes, they can’t make an action. The chair doesn’t get to define the default result.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Well that is a relief. Although that relies on the chairman not pulling the “bullshit” card for Trump and saying the rules are different for this. MAGA does not respect precedent or the law.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            They just don’t have that power. That’s not what a chairperson is. They can say whatever they want, it doesn’t make it real. You don’t have to rely on Republicans to not spontaneously manifest new authority. They aren’t magic.