Critics label as ‘absurd’ idea from government-backed thinktank as country seeks to address population decline

A government thinktank in South Korea has sparked anger after suggesting that girls start primary school a year earlier than boys because the measure could raise the country’s low birthrate.

A report by analysts at the Korea Institute of Public Finance said creating a one-year age gap between girls and boys at school would make them more attractive to each other by the time they reached marriageable age.

The claim is based on the idea that men are naturally attracted to younger women because men mature more slowly. Those women, in theory, would prefer to marry older men.

  • SteefLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Maybe they should check why they dont want kids anymore and fix that. But than they would have to change things for the better for the young ppl and not burn them out, so probably not gonna happen soon.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is funny to me.

        Oh, it costs too much to educate kids? Just put them in schools at a younger age, rip off that bandaid sooner.

        No, let’s not talk about the wound that bandaid is covering up in the first place, that’s completely unrelated.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          “This summer, 100 Filipino domestic helpers and childminders will arrive in South Korea as part of a pilot programme designed to ease the pressure on working women who fear they will have to leave their jobs if they have children.”

          TL;DR - It’s cheaper to pay Filipinos to raise children than it is to pay actual biological mothers.

          • cmeio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maybe also fathers. Would help also if it not falls always back on the women to take care of the kids. There are 2 parents that could shoulder that

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean, if those women would prefer to keep working with more child raising support I think that’s a great option along with some sort of benefit system for those that do want to stay at home to raise kids. I’d imagine the latter isn’t on the table though