• enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah, so you sorta tried to answer this question. But it boils down to “because things”, mainly. Or rather ONE thing exactly. I’d bet that is the sum total of your actual knowledge of Harris’ history.

    Like take this sentence: “Socially, I think Harris leads to some Republican bullshit scheme.”

    What? What does that actually mean?

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Harris cannot win, Harris will not win this election. If she is the nominated candidate all it leads to is Republican bullshit and a win.

      • enbyecho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Harris cannot win, Harris will not win this election. If she is the nominated candidate all it leads to is Republican bullshit and a win.

        “Because reasons”

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, because of many reasons, with the big one being she’s incredibly umpopular and will drive people away.

          • enbyecho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes but WHAT REASONS SPECIFICALLY?

            Y’all so far are just repeating the same thing assuming nobody will notice that “reasons” is so far only one “reason” and not a great one at that. Somebody remind me the name of this cognitive error…

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ve said it in ither comments on this thread I thought this was part of those.

              Bad polling, handling of the border, how she ran the bay area when it came to marijuana charges and cases, perceived foreign policy goals especially in relation to Israel, bad public image towards young people (pokemon go to the polls energy) and a subpar debate record. From what I remeber she was solidly losing until the fly landed on Pence and he got memed to death.

              In the end she will just be women trump or women biden, I.e more of the exact same.