• BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 months ago

    They always hide behind the claim it’s for the children… but how many children have they actually saved from this?

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 months ago

    If consent mattered, governments and corporations all around the world wouldn’t be pushing to expand the global surveillance apparatus.

    Is this just another Tuesday now? Fuck me.

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d vote for testing this mass chat control on politicians and CEOs of the companies that want this mass control. Let’s say for the next 10 years? Or 20? Pretty sure the results will be great. For people, for justice, for democracy.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That won’t happen. What will happen is that functionality will be there, on paper requiring your consent, but you’ll never know how many times they’ve used it without consent.

      They will read your correspondence, find threats to their power, make sure by soft nudges that those never materialize.

      People saying that USSR was democratic will get to live in one, only without even the ideology of “freeing the humanity, building communism and colonizing space”.

  • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Even if you don’t opt in, 99% of the people you interact with would have opted in. So you will monitored as they please.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    As if any chat systems inteded for dubious purposes in the darknet would give a flying f-ck about this law.