• MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is hard to believe this moron has a chance of being president again. We are a doomed country.

    • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t know.

      I’m perplexed honestly.

      I live in italy and here too government took a steep turn to the right since last elections.

      It is like the most roborantly bamboozling idiocy someone from a stage can scream the more he gets applauded as the folks’ hero for speaking their unsung voices.

      On the other hand if you try to build an organic and critical dialogue you only get yawned away as utterly boring.

      I don’t think it is the ones screaming from their stages being the morons, well not the most moron at least, but instead they are those who give their precious votes, hard conquered from their ancestors who gift them with a life in a democracy, to these unambiguously unmistakable frauds, and who hide in the self-obliviousness of the guilty conscience for the vote they have cast their incapability of admitting their own deep existential self-inadequacy.

      • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Lots of people are incredibly stupid. Many of those stupid people are also selfish and mean. It will always be easy to appeal to those people by blaming all their problems on others. Until science figures out a way to force on the empathy parts of our brains, we’ll go through these cycles of stupid people cheering on fascism.

    • Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thank you.

      That Gizmodo article is HORRIBLY written up and there never actually mention the quote outside of the blurb beneath the headline so the lack of context had me questioning them. Pretty shitty reporting.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s so damn annoying. I’m not sure how algorithms are supposed to suppress BS alarmist articles without being accused of bias either.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a great article to fact check the crapnout of, but because people like the “facts” it gets a pass.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which is funny since Biden has the exact same position, which is why he expanded on Trump’s trade war with China by upping tariffs on EVs to 100%. I highly doubt Biden would let China do the Mexico workaround either, if he can help it.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Did China even produce anything in Mexico, my understanding is that they want to produce everything internally.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          They’re trying to bring the European side of manufacturing to Hungary. We Hungarians are unhappy about it, because they get subsidized like hell.

          • takeda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            What’s with that?

            I recently read an article that he is allowing to install China’s face tracking cameras in Hungary. I first thought that he was installing it for his own benefit and just got the technology from China, but this actually will be used by China.

            While I might grasp his unexplained love for putin, this looks like just selling your country to foreign autocracies.

            • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Well, a lot of boomers think office work isn’t real work, a deadweight on the economy, and will turn kids gay thus not making (great-)grandchildren due to not getting dirty and having an air conditioner. The previous system somehow reproduced the toxic Calvinist work morals of capitalist countries, and not only the politically illiterate calls this kind of behavior “communism”, but there’s a very big number of the pensioners, whose votes can be bought by promising more underpaid manual labor to their (grand)children.

              The camera thing might be him getting more and more afraid. He’s losing popularity, and even if he crushes popular movements (often by “doomerism”), there are more and more popping up. If the AI bubble burst (which will cause a financial recession) or some of his allies will fall, he can also fall too. He’s a paranoid maniac that goes everywhere in a bullet vest. He just loves his fellow autocrats, especially as he can work together with them.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        100% tariff on cars imported from China makes them unsellable. However there’s a free trade agreement with Mexico so GM and Ford can use the cheap labor.

        Many people have pointed that out as a loophole and BYD has announced a factory on Mexico. If we wanted to block importing Chinese cars from Mexico, while still allowing GMs and Fords, we’d have to take additional action. This just means both candidates have vowed they would

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          As you said, this would require an additional action.

          And to me it looks like it can’t be done by EO and would have to be a legislation. And during trump very few legislations got passed even when they had a majority.

          The restrictions on sale through Mexico can be implemented when it actually is a problem.

          I found an article where they announced a factory in Mexico, but it first have to be built. The news also appears to be before the sanctions were announced. So if that factory was meant for US market this could change their plans, as adding 100% sanctions signals determination to plugin other loopholes.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They are just trying to one-up each other as always. Children in old-man bodies.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s a funny way to get the auto companies and unions in the three states Biden really needs to go all in on Biden.

    I’m confused. Both of them seem to be trying to lose this election.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why? Better margins on gas cars, I think industrial Michigan would love this because it means they won’t be squeezed into electric car manufacturing. I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets. The consumer may not like it, unions may not like it, but the companies could give a damn.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets.

        We’ve been subsidizing ICE vehicles for the better part of the last century. Famously, Bush Jr passed enormous tax cuts for SUVs and other “light trucks” back in 2003.

        Congress recently passed a tax bill, as proposed in President Bush’s economic stimulus plan, that offers a $100,000 tax credit for business owners who purchase any vehicle weighing 6,000 pounds or more when fully loaded.

        Because these rules didn’t require a business to exist for a minimum length of time or post a profit, car dealerships would help buyers spin up small businesses on the spot in order to avail themselves of the credit. SUVs flooded the market and have been a load on the national car fleet ever since.

        Now we’re pivoting to electric vehicles in order to stay competitive globally, and (fossil fuel endorsed) business magazines have suddenly started poo-pooing the idea of vehicle subsidies as unnatural. Curious.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, that corporate tax credit is also why the Ford F-150 is the most commonly purchased vehicle by millionaires and billionaires. It’s the smallest vehicle able to be classified as a work truck, to qualify for tax credits. They can basically deduct the entire cost of the vehicle on their taxes, because they purchase it through a shell corporation (of which they’re the sole owner and operator.)

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      4 months ago

      Elon will donate a few mil to his campaign, and Tesla will end up being the only company allowed to sell them.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This will eat 80% of Tesla profits, so he will probably ask Tesla to hurry up with the $56 billion he think he is owed.
      Tesla stock would plummet even faster than they have recently.

      Then he will try to convince Trump to use SpaceX for his Space Force, and have Trump implanted with a chip from Neuralink so he can remote control him. 😋 And then blame any problems on the Jews.

    • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well Elon and Trump supposedly talk several times a month, so it’s probably Elon telling Trump to block non American EV sales here. But there’s really no telling what they’re talking about.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump just confused things (Hailey, Pelosi, Biden, Obama etc). What he means is that he will ban European cars built in Mexico, but allow Tesla produced in China.

      I’m half serious, because that’s much more consistent with his policies in 2017-2020

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 months ago

    The party of limiting personal freedom.

    If I want to buy an electric car, why shouldn’t I be able to?

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I want to buy an electric car, why shouldn’t I be able to?

      Because you are only allowed personal freedoms if you express them like every other white conservative and fit a very narrowly defined picture of American culture, ethnicity and gender identity.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m beginning to think he doesn’t have values of his own and has discovered that he can easily keep dangling simplistic talking points in front of America’s most ignorant and most vulnerable segment of simpletons and morons.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I might take it one step further and say that these aren’t Trump’s ideas. These are fossil fuel industry talking points that get pumped through a rich network of right wing talk radio dorks and Brietbart style news feeds and Joe Rogan guests.

        Trump and his ilk are just the guys who can turn a talking point about “nobody is buying electric cars” into a real policy of “nobody is allowed to buy electric cars from over the border”.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The probability we’re going to have Trump for a second term is so much higher than anyone realizes and it terrifies me every time some Millennial/GenZ shrugs and says “there’s no way that dude is getting in” with no intention of voting, because I have seen all this before.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Younger folks are just electorally apathetic. This isn’t exclusive to GenZ and Millenials, if you look back on voter records in the '60s and '70s, even the young boomers at the time also did not vote in droves. It is an age thing more than any specific generational traits.

      • DMBFFF@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        “It a beautiful wall, a fantastic wall, just look at it, ain’t it the best wall ever built? Didn’t I tell you, ‘promise made, promise kept.’?”

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oooh… I can just imagine the cognitive dissonance over on twitter reaching critical mass.

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Can anyone give a legit reason as to why EVs are bad? Because all I’ve seen is “they don’t make cool BROOM BROOM noise” and “they’re bad for the environment” which is only true because of oil and gas companies bribing governments to restrict green energy infrastructure

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      theres only two temporary reasons. 1. the environmental reason is less the gas vs battery situation, but more the EVs are heavy, and the biggest pollutant are car tires. this tied with US consumer obsession of SUV sized vehicles dont help.

      the other is not all places have an equivalent “gas tax” which is used for road maintainance usually for EVs since, well they dont use gas.

      both fixable problems but can be considered a problem

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        the tire wear thing was a very warped interpretation of a study. Tire wear emits more particulate pollution than exhaust does. Pollution from exhaust is primarily gaseous.

        If my math is right, about 2.6 million tons worth of tires are sold in the US annually. While co2 emissions from vehicles amount to around 1.5 billion tons. Even completely vaporizing every tire sold in a year wouldnt come close to tailpipe emissions.

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials for the batteries results in a lot of pollution, and the charging is often provided by coal burning plants?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No one burns coal anymore!

          But seriously I saw one model by energy portfolio per US State, calculating how long you’d need to drive to make up for the additional emissions during construction

          • all had a threshold where the EV came out ahead, lifetime emissions
          • a couple states with cleaner power, had a threshold as low as two years typical driving, then it’s all gravy
          • West Virginia and Wyoming were the worst, with high reliance on coal for power generation. The threshold was 14 years, so an EV would still come out ahead if it lasted its expected lifetime (Teslas are supposedly good for 15 years, 250k miles before replacing battery)

          WV and WY are heavy red, rural, sparsely populated states, so not a good scenario for EVs anyway. But there’s also a point there about how heavily polluting they are, how the efforts if like 379M to reduce our impact on the environment are sabotaged by less than 1M owned by coal companies

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          ofc its one, but that can be said about a lot of resources. the latter was already mentioned which is why i didnt mention it.

        • shunir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure it is, but oil drilling also require electricity provided by same plants and isn’t exactly clean either.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials

          This also leads to a shit-ton of attendant neocolonial shitfuckery - but nobody in the US really cares about that.

      • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I didnt know tires where the biggest polluters, I’m all for getting rid of cars in general but the public transit sucks which makes me think it’s just wishful thinking