Air New Zealand has abandoned a 2030 goal to cut its carbon emissions, blaming difficulties securing more efficient planes and sustainable jet fuel.

The move makes it the first major carrier to back away from such a climate target.

The airline added it is working on a new short-term target and it remains committed to an industry-wide goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

The aviation industry is estimated to produce around 2% of global carbon dioxide emissions, which airlines have been trying to reduce with measures including replacing older aircraft and using fuel from renewable sources.

  • intrepid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get how hard it is to cut down on airline emissions. But the strict requirements on budget has significantly improved that number over the past few decades. Aircraft engines today are much less polluting than they were 30 or 50 years ago. Perhaps the goals shouldn’t be dropped so easily.

    What scares me about this is how lightly climate change is taken. “Yeah, I don’t think we can do it. So we’re going to just stop trying”. Do you even realize what sort of trouble the humanity and this planet is in? Especially for a country dominated by its coastline?

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Profit this quarter matters more to these people than how many die in the next century.

      They’d rather make a dollar today than save a life tomorrow.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If only they valued future lives at a dollar.

        Billions are going to die and people are selling out for a few hundred bucks a year.

        • Eril@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That is the thing: Mitigating climate change does not have a boolean result (we mitigated it or not), it is a scale, without a relevant upper limit. So, if you think “fuck this, we can’t stay even within 3 degrees warming, so it doesn’t matter what we do from here” you are wrong. Even if that is the case, at least try to mitigate 4 degrees and so on. Basically there is a difference between “we are fucked”, “we are super-fucked”, “we are mega-fucked” and so on! Getting complacent is not an option here!

            • Eril@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That is my point though: No matter how fucked we are, it could always get worse. There is no “we reached the limit anyway, so no need to worry about anything anymore”