• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    in regards to security

    in regards to security

    in regards to security

    in regards to security

    Just wanted to make sure you saw it this time because you went off on a tangent there.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t matter if they know about security (which they do). A burglar could know about locks and home security systems, would you take his advice?

      Their positions on security of others is dismissed on grounds of trust not of competence.

      • mriguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The NSA has two jobs.

        The first is to break into any computer or communications stream that they feel the need to for “national security needs”. A lot of leeway for bad behavior there, and yes, they’ve done, and almost certainly continue to do, bad things. Note that in theory that is only allowed for foreign targets, but they always seem to find ways around that.

        The second, and less well known, job is to ensure that nobody but them can do that to US computers and communications streams. So if they say something will make your computer more secure, it’s probably true, with the important addition of “except from them”.

        I won’t pretend I like any of this, but most people are much more likely to be targeted by scammers, bitcoin miners, and ransomware than they are by the NSA itself, so in that sense, following the NSA’s recommendation here is probably better than not.